Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Submittable

Submittable

Starting at $10,000 per year
View Pricing

Overview

What is Submittable?

Submittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social…

Read more
Recent Reviews

Nonprofit review

9 out of 10
May 28, 2024
Incentivized
Submittable has been helpful in implementing educator grants and scholarships for the college students within our program. A challenge …
Continue reading

Use Submittable!

8 out of 10
March 01, 2024
Incentivized
Grant management: application submission and stage management, providing technical assistance, tracking reporting documents and forms, …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.submittable.com/pricing/?ut…

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $10,000 per year
Return to navigation

Product Demos

Watch a Demo Video | Submittable

www.submittable.com
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Submittable?

Submittable offers tools to launch, manage, measure and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and CSR to awards and scholarship programs, the platform is designed to make workflows smarter and more efficient. Users can report on success, distribute funds, prevent fraud and learn for the future—Submittable grows alongside programs.

Submittable boasts users from major foundations and corporations to governments, higher education, and more, and the vendor states they have accepted over 25 million applications to date.

Submittable Features

  • Supported: Grantmaking
  • Supported: Grant Management
  • Supported: Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Supported: Employee Engagement
  • Supported: Employee Volunteering
  • Supported: Employee Giving
  • Supported: Employee Give and Match
  • Supported: Fraud Prevention
  • Supported: Government Grantmaking
  • Supported: Funds Distribution
  • Supported: Impact Reporting
  • Supported: Mobile Access
  • Supported: Grant Application Management
  • Supported: Administrative Reporting
  • Supported: Alerts/Notifications
  • Supported: API
  • Supported: Applicant Tracking
  • Supported: Budgeting/Forecasting
  • Supported: Compliance Management
  • Supported: Customizable Branding
  • Supported: Customizable Fields
  • Supported: Customizable Forms
  • Supported: Customizable Reports
  • Supported: Customizable Templates
  • Supported: Workflow Management
  • Supported: Third Party Integrations
  • Supported: Role-Based Permissions
  • Supported: Payment Tracking
  • Supported: Impact Measurement
  • Supported: Grant Discovery
  • Supported: Grant Award Tracking
  • Supported: Forms Management
  • Supported: Financial Reporting
  • Supported: Email Reminders
  • Supported: Document Management
  • Supported: Deadline Management
  • Supported: Collaboration Tools
  • Supported: Data Import/Export
  • Supported: Deadline Management
  • Supported: Credit Card Processing
  • Supported: Data Visualization
  • Supported: Audit Management
  • Supported: Multi-Currency
  • Supported: SSL Security
  • Supported: Single Sign On
  • Supported: Applicant Portal
  • Supported: Volunteer Recruiting
  • Supported: Scheduling

Submittable Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Submittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social impact programs, receiving nearly 20 million applications, and that teams save an average of 12 hours per week and launch in an average of 14 days.

Submittable starts at $10000.

Blackbaud Grantmaking, SurveyMonkey Apply, and WizeHive Zengine are common alternatives for Submittable.

Reviewers rate Availability and Performance and Support Rating highest, with a score of 10.

The most common users of Submittable are from Small Businesses (1-50 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(98)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-4 of 4)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Submittable to take applications for fellowships and programs. We also use it for processing forms, surveys, and other various RSVPs.
  • allows an applicant to save an application that is in process
  • connects recommendations directly to the specific application
  • ease of uploading recommendations for recommenders
  • Would like to see the ability to have management edit an application on the backend, as applicants sometimes make mistakes and want us to fix them.
  • Needs a better way to edit a problem with a recommender's email address on an application. Currently, the only way is to open a submitted application for editing, which is not ideal after the deadline has passed.
Manages applications well. Can respond to applicants with messages via the system. Allows applicants to track the progress of their application.
  • overall time savings
  • better applicant experience
Their recent upgrade to splitting the "project form" and "form" form is not ideal for our workflow. But, I could see why it is useful for others.
It does simplify the process for applicants. The new feature where applicants can send requests for recommendations before submission of the application has really helped.
WORLDS better than Wufoo - no contest. Formstack didn't suit our needs.
6
Programs, Managing Committee Administration, Finance Office, Administration in general, Fellowships and Grants, applicant tracking.
2
Programs Administration helps the others learn how to use it. The two of us set it up and keep the workflow.
  • Taking of applications
  • Taking and tracking of processing forms for admitted members
  • Ballots and surveys sent to various groups/people/members
  • Having the system attach recommendations to the appropriate application
  • A program that allows applicants to start, stop, and save an application in-progress.
  • A better way to take financial information (better and safer)
  • Make surveys anonymous (if necessary)
  • Trying to create a form for "anonymous online reporting," for cases of harassment/discrimination/etc.
  • An anonymous online reporting form for Personnel Policy violations in case they feel threatened to report it non-anonymously. (we do not have an HR office)
  • Send automatic reminders to recommenders who have not submitted by the deadline.
We have used it for many years now. It works well. We are fully invested in the system with MANY forms. It is also user friendly/easy to use. Looking forward to growing with Submittable.
Yes
Wufoo. It did not allow applicants to start, stop, and save applications in-progress. It also did not allow recommender writers to have their letter attached to the application - we had to go search a form to find the letter then connect it with the application. It took forever and was needless complicated.
  • Scalability
  • Ease of Use
  • Other
Having the system automatically send out requests for recommendations, and then having that letter automatically associated with that specific application. This has saved an extraordinary amount of time for administration. It makes things more streamlined, easier to use, less chance for human error, and less steps for applications and administration.
No change from what we are doing now.
  • Implemented in-house
No
Change management was a major issue with the implementation
New people in charge and we wanted a better/more useful system. We we found room in the budget.
  • Learning curve. Learning a new system.
The program is user-friendly. No issues.
  • No Training
Yes and yes.
The configurability is just right for what we need.
No.
Some - we have done small customizations to the interface
Color and logo added to our forms.
Some - we have added small pieces of custom code
I had our IT person handle the customization.
Adding our colors and logo. Nothing fancy.
I get responses quickly when I submit a question. And the answers are always prompt and helpful. Their blogs about features also answers a lot of my questions. I rarely need to reach out to support, but when I do, it is a good experience.
We did not. We are a small non-profit. We don't have the money and we have had no issues with the program and their responsiveness/response time.
No
Pre-2019, we had an issue where we hit the maximum number of submissions allowed. I wasn't monitoring it and there was nothing in the program (at the time) to tell me how many submissions we had (easily). This was a problem, and I called, got someone, they fixed it immediately. I told them just to charge the account what they needed to in order to fix the problem (wasn't that expensive). We only had a problem for like an hour after I became aware of the problem. Also, now, it is easier to see if you hit your submission allowance.
  • creating a form for use
  • clicking a box to notify relevant people if a form is submitted
  • I have to go to the "Project Form" and "Initial Form" in order to create on full form. It may work for some people, but it's not ideal for how we use it. But, I see the benefits of this system.
We use it for multiple departments. It works well for a lot of different needs and usages. Adaptable and flexible.
No issues.
Things run well. If you are exporting a "larger report," it may take like a minute or two (max). We don't have it integrate with other software.
  • none
  • no plans
  • File import/export
None.
Easy to work with them. They respond quickly.
Easy to work with. No issues.
Very professional.
We had customization, so we did work with them on our needs.
All good.
Just let them know what you need and want. They can help you figure things out.
  • All the new roll outs are helpful, even if we don't always use them.
  • The new AI feature related to translation of forms.
No
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Submittable to manage grant applications, training applications, site visit reports, and final reports. Submittable gives us a central system for multiple reviewers to access, review and vote on applications. These are reviewers both within our organization and those from outside of our organization.
  • Easy system for people to apply for grants.
  • Accessible way for people to access, review and vote on applications.
  • Integrated ways for grantees and reviewers to report on grants.
  • The level of customer service depends on what you pay -- I wish everyone got a real time chat or phone access.
  • They have done a lot to help customize reports which is helpful.
You have to have enough applications in a year to justify the cost. As a small foundation, it became cost effective once we had multiple grant applications each year to justify the cost per application. It is so much easier than the old paper application days!
  • This saves us both time and actual expenses from paper applications.
  • More people can access the applications and we can customize them each year to meet the needs of our applicants.
  • Everyone's application from start to finish is now in one place including the reviewer's notes, site visit reports and final reports. Much more efficient.
Once you learn the structure (which was recently changed), it does make sense. Creating a Project and the related forms are intuitive but you do have to learn some more complicated parts of it (logic options for questions, for example) for it to work well. That takes some time although there are online tutorials and other ways of learning. It isn't always obvious without talking to a human there which is not always quick.
I think Submittable is the tool and the application is the end of us building stronger relationships with our grantees. The tool can make it more or less accessible depending on how you access, design and share out the application. I do like that we can message each other with questions and those answers become part of their application.
We have always used Submittable.
25
Executive Director
Program Managers
Grant review panel members
Board members

We use this for grantmaking and program administration.
We are a small organization with only one employee so we don't have in-house support.
  • Grantmaking for organizations
  • Application for training programs
  • Grantmaking for individuals
  • Site visit reporting
  • Site visit reporting
  • Not sure.
Submittable is easy to use for our applicants, streamlines the grantmaking process and provides structures for a range of reviewers on our panels. i like that you continue to come up with new tools, although I wish many didn't come with additional costs.
No
  • Ease of Use
We have used Submittable for about 7 years so at the time it was our first shift to online applications -- ease of use was paramount.
I would look at the fee schedule and what is included at different levels. Submittable has added features since we joined which is great but not all are included at our subscription level and we can't afford to pay more. It is discouraging to hear all the cool new things and then at the end of the presentation, be told it would require an upgrade to access them.
  • Implemented in-house
No
  • Setting up systems and applications the first time out had a learning curve but that is to be expected.
As a small organization, it was a lot to initiate our first year or two but it was also a long time ago so it might be easier now. The payoff was so valuable and we continue to find new ways to use Submittable. I think it is expected to have a learning curve and some bumps along the way, but the streamlined process is incredibly valuable platform for our applicants and our board.
  • In-Person Training
We have been using this for many years but my memory is that we had a human walk us through how to use basic features. We also used the resource library to learn about specific topics or issues as they came up.
I think it is fine for this kind of product. Most things work well for us and there are other things we would like to use but they aren't in our subscription level.
No
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
NA
It would be appreciated if phone support wasn't tied to our subscription level. As a one-person office, I don't have internal support and sometimes need answers quick than an email. That being said, I have received good support through email within a day and the resource library has also been helpful.
No. We can't afford it. This subscription is a very large expense for us. Worth it but it is expensive for a small organization.
No
We didn't realize that we were hitting our application limit for the year on the same weekend we had a deadline. I wrote to my sales rep in a panic and they wrote back (on a Saturday) and added applications to my limit so the application portal didn't shut down.
  • Copying an application to update for the next grant cycle
  • Using additional forms to ask for grant payment info and final reports - along with deadline and reminder options. I like the flexible deadline option.
  • We conduct site visits before organizations apply and there is no way to link an internal report to an application that comes in later --
This is not an issue for us. We don't have multiple departments or sites.
I don't know that I have ever experienced an outage so it there was one, it was quickly fixed and did not impact our use.
Performance is seamless and quick. We aren't working with huge numbers of applications but reports are easy to configure and load immediately. We don't integrate with other software or systems.
  • None
  • No
The Submittable team has worked with us to provide discounts and multi-year contracts so we can save money and know that we will not have big rate hikes from year to year. They have been responsive as well with negotiating the number of team members and applications within our contract.
We have always gotten a prompt response to questions about our plan.
Discounted rate and multi-year contract at a fixed cost. This helped with our budgeting from year to year.
As I said earlier, it is frustrating when new features are introduced and we hear about them on the quarterly check-ins, only to find they come at an additional cost. I think new featured should be grandfathered into existing contracts and then renegotiated.
Negotiate!
  • Not sure if we upgraded. I don't know what this would have looked like
  • NA
No
Emily (Wong Loi Sing) Fuder | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Submittable to run grant projects with funding provided by our corporate sponsors. We needed a platform to distribute over $2m in funds in 2021, and Submittable was secure, organized, and easy to use for our needs. We wanted to have reviews be fair and impartial by concealing specific applicant information and having applicants submit forms to submittable instead of emailing our team repeatedly helped us orchestrate the grants seamlessly.
  • List sorting of winners/labeled groups.
  • Ease of application creation/question creation.
  • Template building for quick responses to applicants.
  • Labels shouldn't be an option for all reviewers, we had a reviewer for our Florida applicants create labels like "1" "2" "3" which confused my reviewers in California.
  • Running reports across multiple grant projects is tedious and clumsy. Our grant project had 15 regions but it was the same application, we had to compare applications across regions, but could only have a set amount of winners for each area. It would've been easier to create 1 application and 1 opportunity but have filters for the # of applications for each region instead of creating 15 separate applications.
  • Reviewers also found the review forms difficult. There should be an easier way to run a report on their pending reviews in an excel format, or just a better functionality to review. Even with onboarding, our reviewers were confused and didn't use the review function.
Submittable is wonderful for running large-scale grant programs where you're collecting sensitive data, need to have reviewers, and sort through data. It would be less appropriate for a very small grant opportunity and maybe not worth the money if you're only accepting, say, 50 applications. But for one grant we had 1,500 applicants and 196 winners, and the other grant had 252 applications received for our 27 grants. Communication was wonderful, but some applicants reported being locked out of the accounts and very confused on how to get back in/hear if they'd won or not. Sometimes, Submittable was blocked/sent to their spam emails.
  • Submittable allowed us to run a $2m nationwide grant project with only two team members. We wouldn't have been able to successfully run the grant application without Submittable building an infrastructure for success.
  • We were able to respond to every applicant's question within 24 hours because of Submittable's easy-to-use email templates.
  • Our applicants could immediately see if their application had been submitted or not without us having to use any employee time to send manual updates.
For our regional grant opportunity, we had to create 15 different grant applications (using the same basic template, but with different eligibility questions). So it became cumbersome to check on each region separately. We would've preferred one application with more filters on regions so that we could see immediately how each region was doing application-wise. Some of the reporting too is clumsy and shouldn't require checking so many boxes to see responses/filters.
Submittable was great for the applications, but once we had winners, we started communicating with them via our own email address because so many Submittable communications were blocked. If there's an opportunity to "white label" an email and say it's coming from my organization instead of submittable (similar to how our email provider Active Campaign can white label) that would help us with bounce rates and staying connected.
Submittable vs Google Forms is a no-brainer. Yes, you have to make a profile for Submittable, but it takes only a few minutes. Google Forms doesn't have an intuitive or easy way to sort applications or provide a review process. With Submittable, we can track multiple projects at a time without using spreadsheets at all if we choose. It's intuitive, easy to navigate, and one of the best products out there to seamlessly manage a grant or application process from beginning to end.
5
We have our grants and programs team use Submittable to track applications, gather success stories, pull reports for our sponsors, and show impact on a large scale and micro scale within specific regions. Our team also contracts out work to third party reviewers to help us authenticate businesses who have applied using our forms.
2
Submittable fully trained our in-house support team the moment we signed our contract. We had multiple onboarding calls to fully implement the program and use it to its full capacity because of our amazing account manager. The entire team is committed to teaching my team everything we need to know to run our software successfully.
  • Grant Applications
  • Impact Reporting
  • Reviewing
  • We're able to clean our data and provide snapshots of true economic need based on regions via our survey questions in applications.
  • We've used the impact reporting feature to show future donors what their dollars could do.
  • Reaching new audiences through tagging opportunities
  • Growing our base audience overall through tagging
  • Offering review to other organizations to increase our own funding
We use this software annually to help with our grant processes. Without it, I'd be so lost! Our team relies on the data from our past years to sift applications and we try to prioritize those who have applied and been a finalist but perhaps didn't win in years prior.
No
  • Scalability
  • Ease of Use
We wanted to have a program that would make grant applications easy to sort through, rank, review, and prioritize. Ultimately, this program was used by another organization who had run a similar grant we were pursuing, so we ended up signing on as well since it worked so well for our partner organization too. It's been great for us to be familiar with it since other organizations have partnered with us for reviews too!
The pricing was perfect for us, initially it came in out of our budget but the Submittable team was able to work with our budget and make this opportunity happen. I had to sit down with our COO at the time and convince him that this was the only option vs. Google Forms since our team didn't have capacity to sift through 10,000 Google Forms!
  • Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal
We never used a program for grant applications beyond Submittable, so we didn't experience major changes.
  • For our first grant we did 15 separate applications by region, and it was tedious to organize and rank since they weren't in the same project. The following year, we changed our strategy with just one project and we filtered by states to determine regions.
Having Ali as our implementation specialist was amazing. She was patient and scheduled calls for the best times for us. She made sure we had the best foot forward to launch our grant successfully. Because of the implementation, we ran a successful first grant and attracted attention from other major corporate donors to run even more grant opportunities. Thank you!
  • Online Training
  • In-Person Training
  • No Training
We did not receive in-person training technically, it was virtual but it was one on one with a specialist. They were very patient and skilled - she knew everything about the program and honed in on features that would help make our jobs easier. We are so grateful for the training!
10/10 because we were able to meet virtually and still get all of our questions answered! Online was effective too because we could easily record the sessions and review them later. Since we had to onboard our reviewers virtually, it was actually convenient that this was the same method we learned how to use the entire program virtually too.
The product would NOT be as easy to use without training, especially with the report function. We highly recommend using the training approach since yes, the program is easy to navigate, but you could be missing out on really great features that the implementation specialist will show you in a few minutes!
We think the configuration is too limited. We'd prefer if we could adjust access levels for our reviewers to only view specific projects instead of our entire database of applications over the years. We're also hoping to provide a lock on labels, since some reviewers add labels in that personally mean something to them on an application... but that doesn't correlate to the review process. This ability to label makes the next round of reviewers confused.
When you're setting up Submittable, make sure you do the virtual onboarding with a specialist. Do not skip this! They will help understand the grant or project you're preparing for, and help you configure it completely. We use initial review forms to determine eligibility and save some time for our applicants if they are not eligible. We highly suggest this.
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
We did not do any additional configuration or customization to Submittable.
The Submittable team has been nothing but supportive. We truly look forward to our calls with the team since they are all patient, funny, kind, and supportive. They always help us understand the problem and show us ways to avoid the same issue in the future. If they don't know the answer, they find it an immediately follow up. If I could rate the support team a 15/10, I would.
I'm not sure if we purchased premium support, but we have always been very happy with the support received and the initial onboarding with my team in 2021. We're so used to our issues getting caught in a black hole for our other tech programs, but Submittable truly stands out from the rest with top notch customer service.
Yes
Yes, we reported a bug last year with a filtering issue, and it was resolved within 24 hours.
Ali Solomon provided all of our onboarding and was one of the most patient, instructional teachers. It never felt tedious, and she came at it with many ways to accomplish the task. She provided autonomy and suggestions and felt invested in our cause. We were overjoyed with the quality of her support and work in the onboarding.
  • Filtering for assigned reviews is extremely easy
  • Reading applications side by side to the review is wonderful
  • We enjoy the embedded videos and photos in the applications
  • The impact reporting has saved us days of design and work
  • We wish Submittable provided a feature to assign reviewers access to only specific projects. The levels of access are wonderful, but it's missing the ability to hide projects from reviewers who may not be involved with it.
  • Sometimes the video or attachments don't stream correctly, and require a download to the desktop in order to view the full application.
  • We wish we could get half filled in applications just to gather data. We've had 5,000 submissions in draft mode whose data we completely missed because they never hit submit. There may have been other ways for us to support them beyond grants if we had access to their half-filled out application.
Yes, but I don't use it
We were happy to use this for many projects, but sometimes it can be hard to filter for a specific applicant and see how many of our projects and grants they have applied to without filtering by project. We're also hoping to have the feature added where reviewers can only see one project at a time if they don't have clearance to view all of the projects.
We have thankfully never experienced an outage nor been affected by a technology issue on Submittable's side that has delayed our grant process. We have instead been able to distribute over $6M in donated dollars to AAPI small business owners because Submittable is trustworthy and available.
We've had a quick and efficient submittable experience that has always been easy to use. When we need a report it downloads within seconds, even the larger reports are 30 seconds or less to download. Pages are quick to load and reports complete in a more than reasonable time frame.
  • N/A
  • Salesforece
We've wanted to integrate to salesforce but haven't had the manpower or expertise to fully send the data over.
  • File import/export
N/A we have not done an integration
Submittable is flexible and understands the constraints we're working with from a donation perspective. We had a donor come through very late with funding and we were scrambling to renew our product. The vendor was understanding and provided a modified schedule for us to not lose any data, but to still pay them once we had our funding availble.
The team at Submittable is truly top notch. We have only experienced excellent customer service, hospitality, patience, humor, and joy from the team. Even after the sale, the next account manager takes on the project with zest and wants our team to be successful in using the technology to its full extent.
We were able to negotiate a start date that made the most sense for our renewal based on the donation cycle, the amount of licenses we needed to successfully run the projects, and submission allowances that fit our anticipated application count. Ultimately if we need more submissions we know we can buy them!
Pricing is fair for the product and support received, and we are content with the billing being annual in order to save overall. Contract terms are fair, and don't seem inflated for any reason. Pricing per application is also fair, and you can actually have the applicant absorb the cost if necessary.
They will always be on the ball and follow up! Be honest with the dates you're working with and don't leave your sales team hanging. They have goals and deadlines too, be up front and be helpful in return. If you have a constraint, share it with them. If you aren't the decision maker, tell them that too, and tell them the barriers you're having to getting your contract signed. They're often creative and willing to work with you to close the deal.
No
  • The amount of licenses we upgraded to helped us run two concurrent projects from major donors and contract out the reviews to third parties
  • Reviewers having access to specific projects
  • Labeling being only available to specific access levels instead of to all
No
No
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Our organization uses Submittable to manage our annual grant application, grant reviewing, awarding and reporting processes. It is solely used within our granting department, and it wonderfully accomplishes the task of keeping all of our grant work, applications, documentation, etc. for the grant cycle in one location, and all inter-connected!
  • Everything related to any applicant's grant (original application, review process, notifications, all communications, site visits, and reporting) is in a central location and is connected and easily accessible. This is a HUGE timesaver.
  • Submittable's features are time-saving and make grant management easy and convenient, from start to finish. The platform accommodates every stage of the grant cycle, fluidly and intuitively.
  • The only thing Submittable was missing for us was the ability to pre-populate our grant application with a unique 6-digit ID number for each applicant. This was important to us because we match our applicants with a database from the public school district so we have to make sure that each applicant's ID number is accurate. They did not have this functionality, but they were able to provide a reasonable workaround for it.
Submittable is well-suited for any size organization that offers grants, scholarships, etc. and need a cohesive way to manage the process. Submittable also does not seek to restrict your granting ability by imposing caps on the number of applicants or the number of user accounts (reviewers, etc.) or even the number of grants. Other providers that we looked at before deciding on Submittable wanted to charge us several thousand dollars more to offer more than one grant annually, but Submittable did not limit us in that regard and does not charge more for additional grants. This was important to us because we are visiting the idea of offering a second (micro) grant annually, and it's great to know that we can do that without having to worry about exorbitant costs/fees, etc.
  • The Submittable platform has saved us countless hours in legwork, creating databases and spreadsheets for tracking purposes. We haven't had to do any of those things this year. It's a huge timesaver as well, in that it communicates for you. It sends area-specific e-mail communications to everyone involved (applicants, reviewers, site visitors, etc.), and compiles all incoming communications into one mailbox that we can easily go to and get a quick read on incoming comms. So I would say time saved is the most significant positive impact we've seen with using Submittable.
Submittable is pretty easy to use, if you are already somewhat tech-savvy. In some instances, it may not be considered the most user-friendly to those who are not tech-inclined. But it is a great platform that saves a lot of time for grant-making entities and makes reporting and communications extremely efficient and seamless.
This remains to be seen at this point. We are rather new to Submittable, so I think we'd be better positioned to answer this after using the platform for a few grant cycles. So far, it seems to be very intuitive for our needs, and our applicants find it very easy to navigate. Our grant reviewers also have no complaints so far on the platform's usability. They have all been able to access the platform easily, see an informative dashboard of what they have specifically been assigned to, and easily click through to their tasks.
We ultimately selected Submittable because of its ease-of-use, and how willing they were to accommodate our "special situations" without charging us a la carte for additional functionality. The others were several thousand dollars more annually, with LESS functionality and fewer features included.
3
Operations, Fund Manager(s), Grant Administrator(s)
2
A logistical person who fully understands the software overall and can explain its function and access to others who may need to access it for their specific needs, and a person designated to manage the platform, specifically the annual grant process, from application stage to final grant reporting.
  • Grant management
  • Grant administration and logistics
  • Grant reporting
  • E-mail communications
  • Site visit scheduling
  • To manage multiple grant opportunities
  • To offer multi-year grant opportunities on a single application
Submittable has made our grant management so much more streamlined, easy, and way less time-consuming. Compared to our previous platform, the difference is night and day! The functionality built into Submittable is unbeatable.
Yes
Submittable replaced Wizehive, which we were using to manage our grants for several years. Wizehive was working, but every year we still had to do a nice amount of manual work for the reporting and tracking of our grantees and awards. So we were specifically looking for something with these functions built in, and Submittable met and exceeded that need for us.
  • Price
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
The most important factor was functionality/usability. As a non-profit, price is also very important to us, but we were looking for a platform that would have the features we needed first and foremost.
I wouldn't change it, because we really went in deep with selection and evaluation prior to choosing Submittable. We wanted to be sure that we were getting exactly what we needed and getting the very best price for it, so we did a lot of legwork and research, then we did alot of engagement with our Submittable reps prior to purchasing the platform. We engaged our executive level team in the process, as well as everyone on the team who would have any level of exposure to Submittable, and got feedback on it from all of them.
  • Implemented in-house
No
  • None
I would say, provide Submittable as much detailed information on your planned use of the platform and your desires with the platform as possible, and the implementation will be tailored to accommodate your organization with minimal lag time and issues/problems.
NA, I have not had to contact Submittable support as of yet.
No, we did not purchase premium support. We got the basic, because we had received a thorough onboarding for the platform and figured if we ever needed premium support, we could upgrade to it if needed.
No
We've never had to call on support since we started using Submittable, but the support we received during onboarding of the platform was superb! The Submittable team was very thorough in making sure all of our questions were answered and ensuring that we knew how to maximize our use of the platform.
  • E-mail communications
  • Form building
  • Reporting
  • None
Return to navigation