Overall Satisfaction with Moodle
Moodle was put in place to augment our existing training systems, which are two different LMS systems for two very different divisions of the company. Moodle was the software that centralized administrative and other cross-divisional trainings and allowed us to reach the entire company rather than duplicating work in two different systems. Ultimately one of the existing LMSs was chosen as the standard for the whole company, negating the need for Moodle, but while it was in operation it was a good product that serviced our needs admirably.
- Course-driven learning delivery.
- Reporting and status on learner progress.
- Supporting asynchronous learning.
- The interface is getting a little long in the tooth.
- Some functions require drilling down multiple levels.
- Reporting is basic, and requires a lot of manual collation across different learning groups.
- Increased learning by staff.
- Open source (cost reductions).
- Relias Learning Management System, Canvas and Google Classroom
Moodle, being open source, is the foundation a lot of other tools like it are based on. It provides almost all of the same functionality and feature set as Google Classtoom, Canvas, etc., although those products are a bit more polished. All can do content delivery, progress tracking, attendance, reporting, etc. with ease, but Moodle also does this as a completely open source product that can be code-reviewed, audited, modified, extended, etc. at will, provided the expertise is present.
Do you think Moodle delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Moodle's feature set?
Yes
Did Moodle live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Moodle go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Moodle again?
Yes