Miro — the good, the bad, and the pretty (mostly good)
June 19, 2024
Miro — the good, the bad, and the pretty (mostly good)
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I am a professional facilitator and I use Miro as the primary collaboration tool for workshops and offline ideation. It holds the source of truth for each project and we leverage such tooling as frames, shapes, arrows, stickers, comments, timers, voting, image copy paste, Google Suite embeddings, links, presentation mode, etc.
Pros
- Easy-to-use intuitive interface
- Swift onboarding
- Real-time collaboration
- Interoperability with other platforms
Cons
- Comments management
- Lack of offline mode
- Adjusting the background colour
- Improved transparency
- Easy collaboration
We do brainstorms and client work there, now even my teammates turn to Miro without my guidance for their needs.
Miro is more versatile, has more features and can be as simple and as complex as you want it to be. Also very easy supports different types of entities (pictures, videos, links, pdfs, documents, etc.), and does not have a steep learning curve. It has all that I need.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation