Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jira Work Management
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Jira Core is Atlassian's general purpose business and project management tool available to smaller companies or teams and designed to suit a variety of purposes (e.g. marketing planning, product roadmap, etc.). In Jira Core, Workflows define process and enable teams to track tasks. Jira Core Cloud instances also have boards that let users visualize workflows and drag and drop tasks from to-do to done. It is available on the cloud.
$7.53
per month per user
Wrike
Score 8.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Starter - Monthly
$7.53
per month per user
Premium - Monthly
$13.53
per month per user
Starter - Annually
$22,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Premium - Annually
$40,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Considered Both Products
Jira Work Management

No answer on this topic

Wrike
Chose Wrike
We chose Wrike after careful software selection with three other products. The goal is to identify and define a working standard for greater efficiency during the definition, planning, execution, monitoring, and finalization of products. Wrike proved to be the best and easiest …
Chose Wrike
As I mentioned previously, monday.com was just a bit more user friendly, and also colorful which made it easy to track several different projects. It is more aesthetically pleasing. Wrike was chosen for my company by another department, but it is still an extremely helpful …
Chose Wrike
We are combining them. Jira primarily targeted at software development teams and IT projects. Also for more advanced issue tracking and customization capabilities. Jira offers more customization options, including custom workflows and issue types, but we don't need that for …
Chose Wrike
Ultimately, we've decided to move our operations over to Jira. The initial choice of Wrike was driven by the management of the Marketing division; however, I had reservations about this decision from the start. Jira's capabilities seem to align more closely with our needs, …
Chose Wrike
Wrike is much better for collaboration than Newscred.
Chose Wrike
Well, Wrike is our team standard. However, the only problem are some contributors (guests) cannot collaborate. Smartsheet might be another choice for us, since Wrike is more expensive and requires all collaborators to get accounts.

The only thing why I personally, would …
Chose Wrike
  1. Accessible over Cloud, work on project update, anytime, anywhere.
  2. The collaboration using the Stream, the annotation to notify users with their action items.
  3. It is excellent for projects that are quick and result oriented. SMB businesses are well suited to adopt the tool quickly …
Chose Wrike
Wrike is an inbetweener for me, with Trello being a basic entry level platform, but it is free.. which is great to use. Where Jira is a complex platform to use, well laid out for bigger company basses... but quite costly. I do wish that Wrike had more of a sprint task basis …
Chose Wrike
Trello is too simplistic for the scope of the projects we manage, whereas Jira and Confluence are too confusing with too steep a learning curve. Wrike, by comparison, is as simple or as complex as you make of it and intuitive enough that no real instruction is needed on how to …
Chose Wrike
I did not select Wrike. It was in use when I arrived. I actually find it easier to organize and search for projects and tasks in Jira rather than Wrike. However, Wrike does seem to do a better job of reminding me when there are tasks that others have assigned to me that I am …
Chose Wrike
I used Workfront at a previous job and found it to be overly complex and not user-friendly. I also used Jira, which I did not find as intuitive as Wrike. However, Jira did have a very useful capability to run reports on each project, showing the time that each contributor …
Chose Wrike
The gold standard of project management, it remains my "ultimate goal" in any PMO I've been a part of our or overseen. I have yet to encounter a web-based platform that can hold a candle to the reliability and rock-solid stability of Project. There is a steeper technical …
Chose Wrike
I never really enjoyed Asana, so once i learned how to use Wrike, I'm not sure I'd ever want to switch back.
Chose Wrike
We are currently using all of these products. Each of them does some things really well.
Confluence is great for documentation on functionality that isn't changed frequently or to define how a business unit captures metrics.
GitHub is good for source control, but we use Wrike to …
Chose Wrike
I could list a ton more... but in reality, what has been a nice trend in this industry is that the top competing platforms with Wrike, all have adapted and added very similar features, things that didn't exist 5 years ago, are commonplace today among these listed. I would say, …
Chose Wrike
Wrike has better integration and connectors with our actual stack. Also, the customization seems wider and more adaptable to our reality. Visually, both are great, but Wrike offer also has better customer support and services that are needed for a larger group like us. At the …
Features
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Jira Work Management
7.8
30 Ratings
1% above category average
Wrike
7.8
866 Ratings
1% above category average
Task Management8.530 Ratings9.0857 Ratings
Resource Management8.529 Ratings7.9733 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.223 Ratings7.7604 Ratings
Scheduling8.125 Ratings8.3751 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.427 Ratings7.8737 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.729 Ratings8.7857 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.129 Ratings7.7469 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.220 Ratings8.0417 Ratings
Document Management7.124 Ratings7.4717 Ratings
Email integration7.524 Ratings7.3647 Ratings
Mobile Access6.618 Ratings7.4625 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.118 Ratings7.1397 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.522 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.217 Ratings6.9304 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Jira Work Management
8.7
19 Ratings
12% above category average
Wrike
7.5
312 Ratings
3% below category average
Quotes/estimates9.215 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing9.712 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting8.517 Ratings7.3307 Ratings
Integration with accounting software7.510 Ratings7.1182 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(30 ratings)
8.5
(893 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(103 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(13 ratings)
8.2
(229 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(24 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(90 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(32 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(12 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(15 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jira Work ManagementWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
Jira Work Management suits projects involving multiple teams, such as product development. In our case, the design, development, and QA teams use Jira to track tasks from ideation to deployment. Custom workflows and real-time updates ensure that all teams are on the same page, and the ability to link related tasks helps manage dependencies effectively.
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike is great to keep track of the status of a project: who is doing what, when an item is due, and assigning and reassigning tasks as needed. The one thing I don't like is that, although it is convenient to add links, it opens them in the Wrike window instead of a new tab in your internet browser. I think it is a good platform for projects that have 10 or fewer steps/action items - otherwise, your main page becomes overwhelming.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Provide a roadmap of all epics
  • Provide a backlog in which you can see all the possible work to be done to create your sprint plan
  • Have all our projects within reach
  • Have a dashboard with editable columns to manage your work
  • Be able to filter by person
  • Be able to see past sprints
Read full review
Wrike
  • Keeps projects on track
  • Provides tools that make editing and reviewing tasks much easier
  • Helps our team work effectively and efficiently despite many of us being remote workers
  • Visually accessible on multiple platforms which makes it easy to do work from anywhere
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • More clarification on where to find useful tools and resources for new users.
  • Breakdown of Projects, Tasks, Sub-tasks, bugs is hard to follow and cannot be changed once created.
  • The ability to customize the dashboard/home page to fit the needs of individuals could use some work.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Finding projects easier. Unless I pin a project, it can be hard to find again even by searching
  • It would be nice to have an option to add the project name to the end of task names. I implemented this in our workflow when i was a PM and it helps find tasks when you are moving assets or things from one task to the next
  • More reminders for overdue tasks
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
As we are Atlassian users overall, this entire ecosystem is truly built from a 360 perspective. It becomes the one source of truth, and we can easily see where we are in our projects and where to emphasize focus in the upcoming period. There are some areas for minor improvements, but they are more a matter of preference rather than business necessity
Read full review
Wrike
The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of payer contracting workflows. Features such as custom workflows, automated reminders, and real-time collaboration make it simple for our team to stay aligned and efficient. Wrike allows us to track negotiations and related tasks without needing extensive training or technical expertise, which has driven adoption across departments and ensured consistent usage.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
The evolution of Jira Service Desk to Jira work management is accompanied by lot of new features like the List View which allows inline editing, easy column management, the Calendar View bases on extensible modal and state categories, the Timeline View supports tasks and subtasks, the Boards which allow the categorization of status and allow the visibility of subtasks on the cards, Forms can be created very easily, Project templates can be used based on the business area.
Read full review
Wrike
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • For our marketing team, Jira Work Management caused us to lose valuable work time due to manual updates that could have been automated.
  • Due to lack of creative review tools within Jira Work Management, our team had to pursue other tools that do not integrate with Jira Work Management, thus creating additional OpEx.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
  • Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
  • One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows