SAP BPC is Dying
Cons
- SAP should focus on delivering one single product for planning, consolidation and budgeting needs rather than providing a large list of options to choose from.
- The product is not very user-friendly compared to other cloud competitors. There is a heavy dependency on IT teams.
- SAP BPC should come up a pure cloud option.
- The total cost of ownership is high
- Even a simple upgrade project can run into months
- Unstable roadmap introducing the new product every year adding the ever-growing list of options to choose from
- Complex Gross Margin Allocations
- Automating month-end tasks
- Automating access provisioning
- Automated access provisioning
- Encrypting NPI's product price and details
- Automating month-end and QTR-end process
- Financial Consolidations
- Cash Flow Statement
- Fund Flow Statement
- Vendor implemented
- Implemented in-house
- Professional services company
We did Unit and Revenue Margin, Gross Margin and P&L in phase 2.
- Handling business requirements on web interface without using EPM add-in
- Performance of logic
- Automating updates to 70 master data properties during month-end and QTR-end
- Online training
- In-person training
- Self-taught
- Creating multiple hierarchies for each dimension
- Scheduling a job
- Archiving job logs
- Creating dashboard
- Reverting back to a point in time
- Pushing logic to HANA
- SAP ECC - Transactional System
- Mulesoft using WSDL
- Demantra
- Already Integrated
- Already Integrated
- Already Integrated
- File import/export
- Single Signon
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
- ETL tools
- Bug fixes
- Performance
- New features
- AI & ML features
- Cloud platform
- Seem less integration to Big Data and IoT