Skip to main content
TrustRadius
IBM Video Streaming

IBM Video Streaming

Overview

What is IBM Video Streaming?

IBM Video Streaming solutions are used to stream virtual events, executive town halls, video marketing product launches, and 24-hour streaming channels. According to IBM, the solution is built for privacy, reliability and scale, to optimize video quality, and powered by…

Read more
Recent Reviews

IBM Video Streaming

10 out of 10
February 12, 2024
Incentivized
IBM Video Streaming has proven to be an invaluable tool in our K-12 school district, significantly enhancing educational delivery, …
Continue reading

Thanks IBM

9 out of 10
November 07, 2020
We used it for a 2-hour premier of a movie and a zoom Q&A panel to major healthcare institutions around the country. We were looking for a …
Continue reading

IBM Watson Review

8 out of 10
November 08, 2019
Incentivized
It is used across the whole organization to help my clients to watch interviews remotely whenever they cannot join in person at our …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Silver

$137

Cloud
per month 100 viewer hours

Gold

$688

Cloud
per month 2,000 viewer hours

Platinum

$1380

Cloud
per month 5,000 viewer hours

Entry-level set up fee?

  • Setup fee optional
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.ibm.com/products/video…

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $137 per month 100 viewer hours
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is IBM Video Streaming?

IBM Video Streaming solutions are used to stream virtual events, executive town halls, video marketing product launches, and 24-hour streaming channels. According to IBM, the solution is built for privacy, reliability and scale, to optimize video quality, and powered by IBM Watson AI for video search and automated closed captioning.

IBM Enterprise Video Streaming can power security-rich video communications ranging from employee town halls, to trainings and department meetings, often leveraging corporate directories for access control. This cloud-based solution includes AI-driven deep search and the ability to track usage down to the individual user level.

Pricing discounts are available on IBM's pricing page: https://www.ibm.com/products/video-streaming/pricing



IBM Video Streaming Features

  • Supported: Scalability
  • Supported: Enterprise Security
  • Supported: Quality of Service
  • Supported: Integrated Content Management
  • Supported: Multi-CDN Delivery via SD-CDN
  • Supported: Cloud-based Transcoding
  • Supported: Social Sharing with Facebook and Twitter Integration
  • Supported: Integrated Chat
  • Supported: Live Analytics Dashboard
  • Supported: Auto-Recording
  • Supported: Custom Branding
  • Supported: Lead Capture
  • Supported: Live Playlists
  • Supported: Support for Professional Encoding/Production Gear
  • Supported: Enterprise Support Plans
  • Supported: Managed Event and Production Services
  • Supported: Enterprise Content Delivery Network (eCDN)

IBM Video Streaming Screenshots

Screenshot of the viewer's portal experience (channel page).Screenshot of how the automatically generated closed captions can be edited if necessary.Screenshot of the Analytics Console.Screenshot of the Watson Media CMSScreenshot of the viewer's portal experience (channel page).

IBM Video Streaming Videos

IBM Video Streaming Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationApple iOS, Android, Mobile Web

Frequently Asked Questions

IBM Video Streaming starts at $137.

Kaltura, Dalet Flex, and Vidyard are common alternatives for IBM Video Streaming.

Reviewers rate Availability and Support Rating highest, with a score of 9.

The most common users of IBM Video Streaming are from Small Businesses (1-50 employees).

IBM Video Streaming Customer Size Distribution

Consumers0%
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)15%
Mid-Size Companies (51-500 employees)50%
Enterprises (more than 500 employees)35%
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(205)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We are currently using it to stream our monthly funding meetings and council meetings. It is primarily used by the whole organization. Having this streaming service allows our project team members statewide to attend meetings virtually that they are often not able to attend in person.
  • Integrates well with our company website using embed code provided by IBM.
  • No complaints here!
Well suited to live streaming meetings to a large audience.
We benefit from this on a monthly basis. We never have a projected viewership number at any given meeting and this product always meets our expectations whether we are hosting 3 viewers or 30.
To my knowledge, our organization has never utilized this capability.
We do not use these metrics currently.
We are not currently using this capability but plan to in the near future.
2
We currently have two people on our IBM account that are tasked with running our Ustream. One employee makes sure that the videos are recorded and uploaded and the other employee ensures that these videos are available on our website. We currently use IBM Watson's embed code to display our archive of videos and play them, as well as watch them live.
2
Both employees that are tasked with maintaining and supporting our IBM Watson account each have a harmonious yet distinct skill set. The employee tasked with running and uploading the video stream has a diverse background in servers/hardware/sound equipment. The employee ensuring that the live stream and archive is available to our public has skills in HTML/software troubleshooting/helpdesk.
  • Live streaming of our monthly meetings to users statewide
  • Archiving of meetings that correspond with our meeting minutes and allow for precise accuracy of minutes.
  • Future use is to live stream/archive user training sessions.
  • As a necessary resource for meeting minute accuracy
  • Definitely for live streaming end user training sessions.
Our organization depends heavily on this streaming service. Now that we have the option of allowing our clients to attend meetings virtually, we can never retract that option as so many of our clients love the flexibility. Also, we have no complaints with the service itself. It is reliable and dependable and any issues we have encountered have never been to blame on the service but rather our lack of knowledge of it or needing to update our embed code.
  • It has had a positive impact - it has allowed us to reach more people with our monthly meetings content.
No
  • Product Usability
I was not part of the intial decision to use IBM Watson Video Streaming, formerly Ustream. This decision was made by others at the time and I merely inherited access to it later. It may have been based on some research done by our IT tech working for us at the time.
I would research other products available and compare their services to what we currently have. I would also do an in-depth research on each product's reviews. If possible, I would reach out to other businesses that use streaming services and find out what they use and why they chose it and what feedback they have. I would talk directly to the individuals responsible for using/maintaining the streaming service.
  • Implemented in-house
No
  • None that I know of. I was not a part of the implementation.
  • Self-taught
Yes i thought it was easy to learn without the training. Self taught learning honestly depends on the person learning and how they learn best. If you already have some hardware/software experience or are tech-savvy by nature, then yes you can learn this product on your own. If you are not, then I would recommend some official training.
I am neutral on this topic. When we started using the streaming service, I was not a part of the setup or implementation.
I do not. I was not a part of the implementation. I would recommend using your IT department to navigate the setup with you.
No - we have not done any custom code
No. Since i have been involved with Ustream we have done little to no customization.
So far, I would rate support at a 10. I give it this rating simply because in approx. four years of using this product, we have never had to contact support over any issue. I mentioned this briefly in another area of this review and I will expand on it now. A year and half approx. ago, the video player embedded in our custom site quit working and we could not live stream or replay any of the meetings. I went into the HTML code powering this particular page on our site and compared the embed code that we were using in our HTML to what Ustream was showing in the admin tools. These were not the same. Once i copied and pasted the correct embed code from the admin tools in Ustream into our HTML, the problem was solved. In my time of working with Ustream, this was the only issue that we encountered and it was easily resolved without even having to contact Ustream support.
No
No I cannot give an example for this question. I have never had to contact Ustream support. I have reason to believe that this is due largely to this being a reliable and dependable product that, with the proper internal knowledge, education, and experience, can be used and maintained with none to minimal issues.
  • Starting a streaming run
  • Saving the stream
  • Occasionally, meetings will need to be trimmed.
Absolutely. We have never had an outage problem or any application errors that I have been privy to. We are duly notified generally in advance of outages or updates.
As we use it now, we are satisfied with the streaming performance. I cannot speak to integration yet as we have yet to engage in that but have plans to in the future.
  • None yet
  • We plan to use the webex integration option soon
  • File import/export
I have no advice yet as we have not done any integration to date.
I was not apart of the negotiation so I can't answer.
None to give. I was not a part of this process.
No
  • The Webex integration
  • The ability to use the Webex integration
No
No
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use IBM Cloud Video (Ustream® Enterprise) as a professional white label service for the client not interested in using a social media streaming service. These typically include internal corporate communications or government agencies. Once an awhile we'll use the service for universities and colleges for their commencements which the institutions don't feel a social media streaming platform is appropriate.
  • Quick launch of a webcast
  • Player compatibility
  • Broad adoption of third party add-ons and hardware encoders
  • Tech support turnaround on corrupted VOD videos.
  • Channels need to have the ability to stream to two servers simultaneously--like YouTube's ability to stream to two different servers. They also allow you to see the health of the backup stream etc., in real time. Right now the Enterprise® solution for failover includes a 5-second black frame until the backup stream pops up. It also can only be set up by IBM staff as a special request.
  • Ability to customize the player. The older Flash-based player allowed for this. A basic customer customizable player like Vimeo would be amazing.
[Well suited for] lead generation and production companies with no web technical expertise. Clients looking at Livestream® - I would recommend them IBM Cloud Video over that service. Corporate communications would benefit from the registration tracking ability. [Also well suited for] clients looking for a simple way to password protect and domain lock their streams and event companies that want to monetize their content with pay-per-view.
Absolutely. Most clients want no cap to their viewership.
Yes. We've often had clients have their own platforms fail and use IBM as a backup.
Every client wants deep analytics without compromising privacy concerns.
I've only seen the feature in VOD. It's usually acceptable. It would be ideal to have it for LIVE. YouTube is currently in beta for this feature as of June 2019.
The implementation is a strength of IBM Cloud Video. Its ease of use and non-technical knowledge makes implementation very easy. Navigating the social media add-ons requires some testing for a full white-label experience. Requesting features and customizations are fairly seamless in comparison to other platforms. I feel IBM Cloud Video is comparable with other lead streaming platforms.
The usability is very similar to implementation. It's a strength of IBM Cloud Video to have the entire experience be very easy to use. In many ways, the IBM Cloud Video is easier to use and implement than YouTube Live and FaceBook Live. There are no authentication tokens like Akamai or limitations on live player codes. The ability to refresh a new rtmp publishing point is extremely valuable.
We've used the platform as a service provider. We produce live streams for many organizations on many different platforms. When a client needs a platform with professional streaming abilities we often recommend IBM Cloud Video and TalkPoint®. We've had a lot of success with IBM Cloud Video with production partners that want to get into the live streaming service provider world. It's been ideal for projects that happen in other states and countries that just aren't cost effective for us to personally be there on-site.
4
4
  • Corporate Webcasting
  • Institutional Webcasting
  • Rentals
  • Re-Sale of Channels
  • DVR
  • Closed-Captioning
  • Multi-language Audio Tracks
It's a relevant platform despite many alternatives.
  • Positive - it offers an online service to re-sale.
  • Negative - Clients demanding lower costs solutions
Yes
An in-house solution was replaced.
  • Price
  • Product Usability
The usability is the most important factor. The second most important is service options that are in-line with competitors.
Pricing and Alternative solutions with more service offerings included.
  • Implemented in-house
No
Change management was minimal
  • Learning Curve - but was very minimal.
  • Self-taught
Yes. Very easy to use.
It's just right. It would be great to get more embed options--such as dynamic embeds that work both on mobile and desktop without needing to code yourself or visit the FAQ.
I recommend turning off all social media connections if you're looking for simple configuration.
Some - we have done small customizations to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
I've used the dynamic embed code that isn't auto-generated within the platform.
Yes
The support is as expected although weekend support would be better. Many projects happen on the weekend and having support only Monday through Friday just isn't enough.
No
Yes. I recently needed a backup channel and this was completed within 10 minutes.
  • Embedding
  • Password and registration
  • Re-occurring Live Streams
  • VOD Trimming isn't as close to the timing I'd prefer. I often have to add seconds to a trim that I didn't want to.
It's always on. Very rare to have outages.
  • Wirecast Pro - Software
  • Teradek's Core
  • I would like to have IBM Cloud Video integrate better with Telestream's Wirecast Pro
  • File import/export
Get an Enterprise plan. You'll need the back-end developers at IBM to help support the code.
Channels, Viewer Hours, Payment Terms.
Set your payment terms as part of the negotiation. They are very flexible.
No
  • The Q&A Module is Great.
  • Live Closed-Captioning
No
Yes
I changed back in 2013 and never looked back.
Return to navigation