Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SiteVision
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SiteVision is a web application development and hosting platform with specific integrations like geographic information systems (GIS) and emergency management.N/A
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$9.80
per month per user
Pricing
SiteVisionWrike
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$9.8
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SiteVisionWrike
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SiteVisionWrike
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
SiteVisionWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
SiteVision
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
705 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.6699 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.7589 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.8490 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings7.9610 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.6593 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.6698 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.8357 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.1315 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.3589 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.2533 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings7.6505 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.0315 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.8236 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
SiteVision
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
240 Ratings
6% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.1236 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.6135 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SiteVisionWrike
Small Businesses
Craft
Craft
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SiteVisionWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(739 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(94 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(54 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(17 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(83 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(10 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(30 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.9
(9 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(10 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(6 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
SiteVisionWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
SiteVision, Inc.
well suited scenarios are : 1. In terms of architectural context its well suited to know the exact location by 3D Model approach. 2. Its excellent to use in civil construction firms to get the exact distance management approach and to get the best design approach. Less appropriate: 1. For those projects which are not outside or in outdoors its less suited to use there. 2. AR technology +3D tech could be seen in the areas having great land coverage
Read full review
Wrike
My organization used Google Sheets to work with subbies, but we've since switched to Wrike. It is user friendly, has formulas and customizable fields. Wrike has been a lifesaver because instead of sharing Google Sheets with external customers and typically they messing up - deleting formulas, users can simply fill out a request form without logging into Wrike . All details are displayed in a table view, making management much easier.
Read full review
Pros
SiteVision, Inc.
  • Get the exact AR version of the project site
  • Helps in distance management on the site by measuring the spatial points.
  • Helps in power management too.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has been consistent in emailing any updates or changes to each person involved in each task.
  • Wrike has a simple to navigate website, with quick access to each task.
  • Wrike keeps all data files located at the top of the task for quick reference, which makes it easier for each team member to find.
  • Wrike adds date tags as well as any edited or deleted notes where we are able to cross-reference any major changes that may have been made.
Read full review
Cons
SiteVision, Inc.
  • cloud services could be improved much.
  • accuracy could be enhanced for the hardware tools like GNSS
  • The AR technology could be mixed with the other latest updates to make the system more efficient and light.
Read full review
Wrike
  • The email notifications that are automatically sent from Wrike when something is done are easy for users to miss or ignore.
  • Reporting can be limited. You have to create workarounds for collecting/storing the name of the person submitting the form in instances where they do not have their own Wrike license.
  • A more user-friendly interface, especially for those less familiar with project management software, would enhance overall accessibility.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike, overall, is pretty easy to setup and use. I still find challenges in changing milestone dates but our programs / date changes are different than industry standard so that is partly the issue. We love the Excel look along with the dashboards! There are also built in analytics that really assist in seeing where the projects are!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Support is very quickly and they want to solve problems actively. When I need additional info I can use community forum, when I've an issue I can use support form to get help. The support is of excellent quality from the first level, to grow when you talk to the engineers it becomes even more important
Read full review
In-Person Training
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SiteVision, Inc.
1. Easy to use 2. Easy to accessible from play store 3. Clarity of the apps shown in the screen. 4. Help center is very helpful. 5. Accuracy is very good as compare to other apps. 6. Distance management and AR tech mix up is really appreciable. 7. Power management is nice add on feature
Read full review
Wrike
I have not used other products except Microsoft Teams channels with file sharing and standard sharing from Adobe, text and email messaging, and Zoom/gotomeeting sharing. This is the first product that I have used that had the functionality and platform where the sharing is simplistic. It is better than standard sharing through email or other simple forms because everything stays together.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Wrike
not sure
Read full review
Return on Investment
SiteVision, Inc.
  • got the clear contextual clarity of the site
  • Exact augmented points are there so that spatial data could be more enhanced.
  • power management is an excellent approach which has a greater impact on the project.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
  • Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of Wrike TemplatesScreenshot of Team WorkloadScreenshot of Wrike ReportsScreenshot of Wrike apps & integrationsScreenshot of Wrike Gantt Chart