OnRamp vs. Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI

For in depth large clients with a lot of information and a big build this is a great way to keep things organized, especially if a lot of people are involved. It is not as useful for smaller clients that do not require as much work or required documents

Incentivized

Evisort is best when you already have all your contracts fully cleaned, designated, ordered, managed, linked, collated, titled and termed. It is not good if you expect the platform to help you go through a repository of contracts that you want the system to extract all the info you need and then you can decide easily what to keep and not etc - the sales team will tell you that the platform can do all of this. In my opinion, this isn't true.

Incentivized

• Accountability of certain tasks
• breaking down what is needed for each task
• Being able to submit forms or ask for certain information

Incentivized

• Houses Contracts centrally
• Info display is pretty straight forward
• Terms Search function is solid

Incentivized

• Full management overview of all active projects in a Kansan style board would be good
• Tracking internal ad hoc tasks for projects like customer reported bugs or features, would be great to have follow up targets and better ways to track allocations for these
• Better way to return to a task overview after editing sub-task builders (at the moment it returns to the list and not the specific task or module)

• Platform Implementation
• AI intake of documents
• How contracts are linked

Incentivized

It is very easy and great to use. I love how customizable it is and I can structure it for specific clients while also keeping a specifc theme

Incentivized

It is clunkier than needs to be but it's not as bad as some of the other platforms we reviewed. The interface is pretty spartan, almost like reading a page and some color and segregation could help users segregate the UI by function and task. This is pretty straight forward but doubt they would implement

Incentivized

For all of the reasons listed above, essentially, once the platform is implemented it has its value, however, knowing what you get before implementation, might give ppl pause. The cost is a bit misleading and the sales team over promises and under delivers in my opinion. This is not cool and creates issues inevitably, down the line.

Incentivized

All of the others are internal only (or at least the features I have tried), and the key value for us with OnRamp is the customer facing portal. the internal project management and task tracking could be better when compared to other platforms - I probably still have a preference for Wrike or Asana personally for internal items

Evisort is just getting in the game. Implementation is not as robust as Coupa and Adobe is more of a contract execution platform so it is not apples to apples to compare there. Essentially, Evisort is a a somewhat cheaper solution that is not a complete solution and needs more of an upfront lift than they would suggest.

Incentivized

• It has probably saved me between 2-8 follow up emails and calls with customers on a project, easily accounting for 30minutes to 4 hours saved on projects where the typical billable time is 30 hours.
• I would think that the improvement in own organisation and tracking follow up tasks/needs saves me at least a couple of hours on a project over its duration. Information is more accessible and I am kept on tasks more effectively

• better Contract visibility
• centralized ownership
• contract alerts

Incentivized