Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Miro
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Compared to other options Miro had a great balance of ease of use combined with advanced features that made creating boards to suit our team requirements a lot more straightforward.
I find Miro's interface quite similar to Canva's. The same degree of difficulty to learn and use, but in the end a powerful tool and generally liked by its users. I couldn't add a qualifier between these two - I've used Canva before, and I think multiple users can work on the …
Miro is easier to use than either Figma or ClickUp for communicating in this way. We still use Figma to generate high-resolution comps, but Miro has a lower entry bar for usage. ClickUp is trying to do too many things. Miro allows beginner and advanced users to get up and …
I didn't get to choose Miro, but if I could, I would. JamBoard is not on the same level as FigJam or Miro. Between Miro and FigJam, FigJam is just more delightful to use and collaborate on—with or without an audio/video meeting. Being able to chat with collaborators from within …
I haven't really tried any other similar products but I've heard about Edvibe and even whiteboard on Zoom has now similar features, but as soon as you finish your Zoom meeting the information is gone from the whiteboard.
I think Miro is far from the competition I used to work with. Also, to be honest, I didn't use too many other tools for the same purpose I used Miro. But there are some use cases that I can guarantee I cannot use these other tools for, like the planning one, since I will need …
Miro gives more freedom when we need to draw ideas, sketch some products and explain our vision. Their multimedia set of tools is very powerful and allow interactivity, communication and collaboration between different teams. As I said before, is a very useful tool for those …
Miro makes it easier to share and has better tools. We've tried Google Slides and Microsoft Whiteboard, but the availability of tools and different sharing settings gives Miro a superior advantage over them. In our setting, we leave Miro open on 3 TV's with a cheap computer …
Miro seems a little less technical/designer-y, which is worse for creating designs, but better for the type of whiteboard collaboration the teams use the tool for.
We tried to switch to other apps because Miro lacks all diagramming features, especially for BPMN. We were coming back to Miro because it's visually the best software with the best User Experience ever. Every tool we used so far was hard to navigate and explore features. Miro …
Miro has many more features and options than Mural, making it a much more flexible tool for a variety of use cases, including virtual whiteboard, low-fidelity prototyping, presentations, and visual documentation. We tried Mural, and it felt comparatively restrictive.
Miro provides a clean and open format similar to Keynote, which we like, but Miro has much more flexibility. Miro's use of links with thumbnails allows us to work with images and links to other files all in one place. Miro also allows multiple users at the same time with …
Miro's UI is way more friendly and flexible than Mural. Mural flows less easily than Miro, and the facilitating tools in MIró are way better. Figma core is centered on vectorial artwork. On a smaller scale, Miro can capture some of that for diagrammatic works and nonspecialized …
The notion is quick and facilitates collaboration easily for organizing information through text. However, Miro is decidedly more advantageous for structuring and organizing information while discussing.
Miro wins on ease of use, quick onboarding, and generally on making the cost of entry very low. Other tools may focus more on collaborative creation or an expanded feature set, but for my purposes, simplicity wins.
It is well suited to do different types of presentations, projects, mind maps, tables and so on, even for private purposes like creating to-do list, planners, files with images, PDF texts. I don't really know where it is less appropriate. Only for people who do their jobs outside. Anyone who works in the office can use it for some purposes
Retro. At different stages of the meeting it is important to be able to work with the board at the same time (to indicate what went well or badly), as well as to be able to quickly visualize the information (to combine clusters of problems) and to indicate solutions with arrows.
Display information at different levels of abstraction. This is especially important for our product backlog. It is important for different people in the organization to see different levels of presentation.
All the benefits of a physical whiteboard, plus the advantages of the digital world. Working with the world is extremely intuitive. You can invite people who use Miro once a week and I don't have to do a 15 minute briefing on how to use the tool for them.
There is no other tool like Miro for process Mapping in particular. I've tried PowerPoint, Word, and other programs, but when collaborating virtually on how to improve a process, Miro has all of the tools and more to enable successful mapping. The colors, different types of shapes and text books, along with the ability to integrate different documents and other functionality, make it ideal for this purpose. In a virtual world, it's a must-have.
It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
The support staff at Miro are fantastic. Whenever I have had an issue, they have been timely and helpful with their response. They are also very knowledgeable and go out of their way to not only help, but offer proactive training sessions on different topics and new functionality so everyone can try it out.
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
There was not enough training for users to understand all the key features. The rollout was very high-level, but when users are expected to start adopting it, you have to ensure they are given the proper tools to do so. Miro is a great tool, and proper training is key to adoption.
Miro is visually appealing, very inviting, and easy to use for the most part. It has all the drawing tools to connect shapes, create aligned diagrams, change colors, establish a layout, and color them. You can quickly change font sizes. In our meetings, teammates are very willing to follow along on Miro.
Miro is great for scaling. In every department and subdivision across my entire organization, there is someone using it. From Sales to marketing, to manufacturing and operations; and even in legal and finance, there isn't a process or a department that is not using Miro, and if they aren't, they're missing out! Even at the highest to the lowest levels of the organization, it is essential for virtual collaboration.
Positive impact - we've been able to reduce the time it takes to arrive at MVP, crawl, walk, run requirements and turn them over sooner
Roadmapping and seeing at a high level what the roadblocks or risks will be 3, 6, 9 months ahead of time has allowed us to be more planful and mitigate tech debt. IT is informed earlier to resource or stand up workstreams sooner and be less reactive.
Customer Journey mapping - until Miro there wasn't any real documented or consistent ways to show and agree and document our CJ's. It forced some behaviors within our organization and transparency to come to the surface - saving us all time and money on where we spend our dollars.
