Writer is better than Copilot
June 27, 2024

Writer is better than Copilot

Dave Fiske | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Writer

I use Writer to help me summarize content such as meeting transcripts and other long pieces of content. After I summarize the information I use it to send as a follow up to the audience as a way to continuously keep them informed of what they've already seen or missed out.

Pros

  • Summarize content
  • Create cross referencing between multiple sources

Cons

  • would be awesome to allow it to add a URL as a source so it would be able to reference live content rather than copy and pasted content
  • I'd love for it to integrate with other solutions such as MS CoPilot
  • Seamless integration with MS Teams for summarizing transcriptions easier would be huge
  • Definitely positive. Summarization is the fastest way to get content out to people and catch their eye
  • We get chunks of information from people to build an agenda and Writer builds it for us and uses words that help keep us on message
these are not configured
I use both. CoPilot does a great job of sources content but lacks good outputs. Writer can import that content and make the deliverable understandable and useful.

Do you think Writer delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Writer's feature set?

Yes

Did Writer live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Writer go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Writer again?

Yes

Writer is great at helping me gather information and sort it into smaller chunks. I've not used it for actually building new content so I can't comment on that yet.
My favorite new use case that I'm using it daily on is cross referencing multiple sources to generate a single output.
I've tried using it to generate tables/graphs with no luck. Co-pilot struggles with that too.

Comments

More Reviews of Writer