Overall Satisfaction with Tricentis NeoLoad
have easy-to-maintain test cases. That’s why we shifted load and performance
tests from JMeter to Neoload. Currently, we are testing web applications automated. SAP is in the queue.
But there are several learnings: In preparing the tests, we need
a storybook or a TOSCA automated end-to-end test case to minimize the effort
during scripting. This also contains login information and test data. No try
and error during scripting!
The execution phase is an online meeting that acts as a war room where all
necessary stakeholders are invited. They are responsible for monitoring the
systems and collecting traces. In the analysis phase, all collected
information is consolidated into a report. The results are discussed in the result meeting. Here we decide on measures and next steps. We learned that load
testing is a team sport.
Pros
- Recording of test cases
- Reporting the results
- Maintaining the scripts
Cons
- Usability of the GUI
- Licence polica
- 95% cheaper maintenance effort in comparison to JMeter
- Faster performance testing
Do you think Tricentis NeoLoad delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Tricentis NeoLoad's feature set?
Yes
Did Tricentis NeoLoad live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Tricentis NeoLoad again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation