CCH Tagetik at a Glance
Overall Satisfaction with Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik)
We use CCH Tagetik for our global consolidation of financial statements. It is mainly used by the finance department. We also use it for our budgeting process. All key directors input their budgets and our back office compiles the data to create our global budget.
Pros
- CCH Tagetik is extremely flexible and customizable to your business needs.
- It creates financial statement reports extremely fast and gives us the ability to slice and dice financial metrics in more ways than you can imagine.
- I see CCH Tagetik as a long term business partner to help us solve problems.
- A solid implementation team and process.
Cons
- Until you get familiar with the software, screens, buttons, etc, are not necessarily intuitive. It just takes time
- Without being involved in the implementation process. A new user might have some difficulty getting up to speed on writing reports and using the system.
- Having a liaison at CCH Tagetik that really understands our business needs so they can help guide us at various stages on implementing parts of CCH Tagetik that we may not be aware of.
- Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
- A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
- Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
- bi360, deFacto Performance Management and Solver
Are all very different. CCH Tagetik was more flexible and diverse and has the ability to grow with future unforeseen business issues.
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Feature Ratings
Using Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik)
30 - General ledger and reporting including quarterly and annual SEC reporting and audit collaboration.
10 - Finance, IT, data analysts, project coordinators,
- Consolidation
- Budgeting
- Statistical
- Statutory reporting
- Dashboarding
- Board reporting
- Fixed asset planning
- HR planning
- Board reporting
Evaluating Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik) and Competitors
Yes - FRx because it was becoming unsupported.
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Vendor Reputation
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
- Positive Sales Experience with the Vendor
- Analyst Reports
Product usability. Ability to be a solution for future business needs.
Wouldn't change a thing.
Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik) Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Yes - First consolidation then budgeting
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled - Getting used to the new way
- Just getting used to writing reports
- Time to find from regular job to implement
Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik) Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
Yes
If and only if we need expert assistance and cannot accomplish with our internal staff
All of our onsite meetings were very successful.
Using Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik)
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent | Lots to learn |
- Physically running of reprts
- Getting used to creating reports can be difficult to get used to
- Navigating until you get used to it
Yes, but I don't use it
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation