Red Hat OpenShift review
Overall Satisfaction with Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift is used for a lot of different workloads in our organization; web apps, services, ML, and vendor provided applications. Main business problems Red Hat OpenShift solved was speed to market, and allowing developers to own the process and their applications.
Pros
- Easy deployment
- Speed to market
- Empowering developers
- Ability to easily spin up more pods for heavy workloads
Cons
- Complicated setup and maintenance of clusters
- Overall cost
- Time to spin up a new app is minutes, as compared to days/weeks for spinning up new VMs
- Empowering developers to deploy and maintain applications within their namespace
- Allows for more flexibility to deploy applications
I'm on the server side, so it's hard for me to quantify the overall impact, but I believe it has helped tremendously to deliver new applications, as well as applications updates to our environment. The overall adoption of Red Hat OpenShift by the majority of development teams has been high, and the feedback from developers has been very positive for the most part. Any negative feedback I'm aware of has been primary due to over committing resources.
These were both stood up for separate products. Needless to say the workloads on CDP are going to be migrated to Red Hat OpenShift in the very near future.
Do you think Red Hat OpenShift delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Red Hat OpenShift's feature set?
Yes
Did Red Hat OpenShift live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Red Hat OpenShift go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Red Hat OpenShift again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation