Item: QA Wolf
Rating: 9
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with QA Wolf

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Previously, we had a couple QA engineers manually test new features. This wasn't great because features only got tested once, when they were initially introduced. QA Wolf writes tests for us for new features that then run on all subsequent deploys. It helps us catch a lot of bugs before they get onto production!

Pros and Cons

Pros

Super responsive
Taking work off of our plate

Cons

Very occasionally there's excessive back and forth about a failing test

Return on Investment

Helped us catch bugs before they got out in the wild
Generally save us time over communicating with a QA engineer

Key Insights

Do you think QA Wolf delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with QA Wolf's feature set?

Yes

Did QA Wolf live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of QA Wolf go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy QA Wolf again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

QA Wolf is great if you still have a manual QA team testing features on staging and production.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

QA Wolf is great for teams looking to automate QA