Honest IT Review.
Overall Satisfaction with Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
We use Parallels to help facilitate remote connections to URLs and applications only hosted on our intranet.
Pros
- Sandboxed Browsing.
- Remote PC Connections.
- SAML Integration.
Cons
- O365 becomes problematic due to tokens and can only be fixed by directly signing into the server. Passthrough MFA functions would be excellent.
- Ability to open Office files that are shared in hosted files shared with locally installed PC applications.
- The ability for PC client configuration updates once connected to the remote store would be nice.
- Reduced Licensing Costs moving from Citrix.
- Improved support moving from Citrix.
It takes a few days compared to many weeks to setup Citrix appropriately.
- Citrix Workspace (discontinued), NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway
Less expensive. Better support. Better documentation. It's easier to set up.
Do you think Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation