Miro : a must-have for hybrid collaboration.
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Pros
- Real time collaboration
- Amazing selection of templates
- No space limitations
- Easy to export
Cons
- You cannot see who is collaborating unless they have a license.
- The privacy settings when starting a team are not crysta-clear. Documents do not get automatically shared within the team
- We cannot measure impact as such but I perceive a good impact on engagement.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Using Miro
- Running collaborative workshops with remote teams
- Process mappings
- Brainstorming and mind-mapping
- Get-to-know each other activities
- Documenting 'old-style-on-paper' process mappings and transfer them to online tool (Miro) so we can consult it in the future
- Collaborative, non-real time exercises.
- To collect user stories and requirements
- For process improvement
Using Miro
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- zooming in and out a workspace
- creating new shapes
- adding text
- adding arrows to link shapes
- password setting, once you save a password. If you forget it, you´ll need to enter a new one. You cannot consult the set password even as a creator of the board.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation