mabl - Easy to use UI test automation!
Overall Satisfaction with mabl
Our company uses mabl for our automated UI tests. The tool we were previously using was sunsetted and we searched and demoed many tools. We initially had an issue using mabl with our application due to some functionality we have on our application, however we wrote back to them telling them that we wouldn't be able to move forward because of this not being supported and we moved on to looking at other tools. Even though we weren't even mabl customers yet, they wrote back as soon as they had that supported, gave us another free trial to try it out, and the rest is history. We were unable to import our previous tests, however, the mabl trainer made this fairly quick work. We have mabl integrated into our CI/CD pipeline now and we are enjoying how easy it is to create and run tests.
Pros
- mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
- Organization - labels and flows make this easy
- Customer support!
Cons
- Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Integration with other tools
- We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools.
Do you think mabl delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with mabl's feature set?
Yes
Did mabl live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of mabl go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy mabl again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation