Kira goes international: difficulties of implementing Portuguese smart fields
June 29, 2020
Kira goes international: difficulties of implementing Portuguese smart fields
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Kira Systems
Our firm has used Kira so far mostly for training it to read contracts in Portuguese. We have achieved good accuracy in some clauses so far and have used the software in a few due diligences for M&A transactions. Kira was used only in controlled scenarios and by people that are part of our project on implementation.
Pros
- Good out of the box clauses in english with great accuracy.
- Good costumer services, always with fast and efficient responses.
- Easy to use, not requiring much training for using.
Cons
- Kira doesn't have out of the box clauses in other languages.
- High prices, especially considering the market in Latin America.
- Capacity of reading other types of documents, such as certificates.
- Negative ROI
- Marketing as a technological law firm.
- Many team hours spent on training clauses.
The most important reason for selecting Kira was its commercial range. We observed that Kira was used worldwide and by the largest law firms in the US, so we presumed it had better features than Luminance. Other than that, Kira seemed to have more tools for training clauses in Portuguese and a more user-friendly interface.
Do you think Litera Kira delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Litera Kira's feature set?
Yes
Did Litera Kira live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Litera Kira go as expected?
No
Would you buy Litera Kira again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation