IBM MQ great stability.

Software Version
IBM MQ
Overall Satisfaction with IBM MQ
Pros
- I think the best thing is what it does, the support for the cloud. It is something that greatly speeds up work life since almost everything is now remote and connected to the cloud.
- The transfer of files is super fast; you can manage and encode all the tasks in the same batch for the transfer of files that notify the cell phone when everything is ready.
- Intermittency and communication from security or records or HR program make everything possible in one; it is really easy to intertwine the programs so that each one does the management task giving order to the next.
- Those of us on the IT team use many.
Cons
- We believe that the price is very high, we believe that there are colleagues who would like to acquire it or more departments in a unitary way, and not all companies jointly resort to the use of this software.
- Initially, the documentation is very unclear, and there are ambiguous things; in this sense, you need specialists to understand exactly what it is about, but technical support is of great help in determining each significance.
- The installation is easy, but there are times when you have to choose options, and this slows down the choice since they are not common.
- There are some advantages that other services like amazon provide that IBM doesn't have, although in this case, amazon is even more expensive than IBM, and this still makes it more convenient.
- I believe that the best ROI has been the simple handling and management; without equal, it has a high capacity to carry out transactions, and it is light and agile.
- The connection times are more stable, stable in the sense of 24/7, alternative programs cause lags to arise for high hours of use, but IBM has proven to be a rock.
Do you think IBM MQ delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM MQ's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM MQ live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of IBM MQ go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM MQ again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation