Our Experience withF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager
March 22, 2024
Our Experience withF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
We are using F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to deliver almost all of our applications, be it web-based apps, API gateway for mobile apps, and also act as an ingress controller to our Kubernetes environment. The load balancing capability and SSL offloading performance are top notch. The iRules feature gives us much needed flexibility.
Pros
- Serving more than 20 thousand concurrent connections on a single virtual server to handle API gateway for a mobile app
Cons
- Web-based UI can be made even simpler
- The positive impact of using F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is we are able to simplify our day-to-day operations and also accelerate application publishing.
We combine the AWAF and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to not only deliver high performance apps but also secure the apps against so many kinds of threats.
Do you think F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)'s feature set?
Yes
Did F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation