SilkRoad RecruitingPricing

The cost was very high It made managers more involved in the process It got managers

SilkRoad was less expensive than Taleo so we chose them instead.

campus. Now the entire process from requesting a job, to approving and pricing it, to posting, to hiring a candidate is done in this system.

reporting we needed and every time we needed something special it was an extra cost.

level. If they are very small company, very low demand, this ATS may not be cost effective. For the VERY large companies with extreme demand, the occasional … what is now Taleo, Kenexa. To be frank, at the time, Openhire was the most cost effective, and it allowed a large…

Therefore, we removed ownership from them at all. Licenses are fairly expensive and because we had a lot of HR employees it was difficult to have so many

system. For the basics of applicant tracking and reporting, this system is a cost-effective choice. If, however, you are looking for a sophisticated ATS with … system. For the basics of applicant tracking and reporting, this system is a cost-effective choice. If, however, you are looking for a sophisticated ATS with … selection at my previous company based on its globa…

Easy to implement User friendly and intuitive Cost efficient Helpful customer service … in all aspects, especially the cost. The company was not in a position to afford a solution such as Oracle PeopleSoft. The only reason we did not renew OpenHire

your processes....no one solution can do it all. OpenHire is also a good value.

OpenHire offered. We would have been better off with a more basic and less expensive system.

use and had great reports. Cost is a little higher than some of the competition but for what they have to offer I think the value is there. I would make sure … allow IT to dictate what can and con't be done. I made that mistake and it cost me some functionality in using the…