LambdaTestPricing

market. I have been a LambdaTest user for more than 3 years now and it is cost effective, accurate and helps in quick debugging of UI issues for me and

LambdaTest has a competitive pricing which suited our budget

testing, Mobile App testing and IP Geolocation etc The tool is quite good and cost effective when it comes to addressesing issues of compatibility, speed, and … If you want to explore a cost effective soluti…

the LambdaTest for cross browser and cross OS testing, because it's so cheaper to simulate the application on different virtual platforms on LambdaTest

LambdaTest tool is good in term of pricing as well as performance. It have user friendly UI which give good experience

BrowserStack, TestSigma, and BugBug, LambdaTest stands out with its affordable pricing and rich set of features like geolocation testing and smart analytics … budget. While BrowserStack may feel more polished, LambdaTest offers better value for money.

We chose LambdaTest over BrowserStack and Sauce Labs because it offers a cost-effective, easy-to-use, and efficient cloud-based testing solution. While … and Sauce Labs excels in enterprise automation, LambdaTest balances affordability, parallel testing, and geolocation testing,…

It saved our money because of it's inbuilt features. Low cost. One click bug locking reduced efforts of our team members … smarter with more capabilities than Browser stack. Browser stack more expensive then LambdaTest.

devices. It allows me to not have to procure physical devices which can be expensive and restrictive as the access given to us would be to only one version

devices Affordable Save lots of time … Save Time Affordable

very positive impact on the business objective as its save lots of time Very cost effective

With LambdaTest the multi-device testing was easy but then I think the pricing should be reduced little bit or free tier should be increased if possible … Increase the free tier time limit Reduction in the costing at least a little would…

It is very usefull for us till date and reduce our cost in buying real devices.

choose among mobile or performance aspects. Cost efficient which makes affordable to go with quality on the mind. Deliverables also on time and no lagging

Instead of browser it reduces the execution time of the testcase. Its price is also affordable any client of user can buy it. It has cross OS execution capabilities

It eliminates the need to have an actual device which cuts the cost for the company

Its very easy to integrate. It is very affordable. Its save lots of time.

saves lots of time. It saves money also because subscription is very affordable.

devices. Buying multiple mobile devices just to test the application is too expensive, in such case LambdaTest solves this problem, by providing real devices … LambdaTest made the overall testing process a lot easier It saved lot of cost as we dont have to buy muliple devices…

test completion Detailed report for knowing and tracking down the issues The Cost if comparatively lesser than the competitor which benefits small organisations

It eliminates the need to have an actual device which cuts the cost for the company It is very accessible and can be used with any browsers and

fast cheap easy to use Modern … Lambda is more cheaper and simpilistic

Very cost effective product. LambdaTest gives all QA functionality in less price compare to other products.

Cost … that advanced for what I’m using it for. It didn’t seem like the monthly cost was going to be worth it at least not right now.

identify bugs early. This resulted in a huge reduction of development/QA cost and effort. Thank you LambdaTest for doing this right. … Saved the money spent on real devices Saved the effort and cost of QA engineers Improved confidence in developers