200 hours back no breaches one uninterrupted connection.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- Cisco's firewall actually does its job of blocking what it is supposed to block. We had an old Firewall that led to slippages. Cisco catches 97% of malware and vulnerabilities during testing. For Coitiar, that means an engineer who clicks a link with malware is handled quickly.
- We actually tested if failovers would affect running sessions. We pulled our primary unit during a certification submission period. The firewall just switched, and the connection kept running.
- The AI assistant in policy management is excellent, and for our lean team, it makes the whole process easy and efficient. I don't have to audit 200 policies manually; the AI steps in and does its thing.
Cons
- I feel the management interface feels slow and not that intuitive. Clicking policies and saving changes while waiting for deployments is not slow, but it is not snappy either.
- For us, we run active standbys for resilience, and Cisco charges for both units, even if they sit unused. I feel like a fairer HA licensing model would be much better.
- Learning about critical system vulnerabilities the hard way from Security outlets, not Cisco itself. This needs improvement.
Return on Investment
- We saved roughly 200 hours across our three shared units last year. That's raw statistics: our engineers had time to improve members' services instead of wrestling with rule bases.
- Our members submit installation documents to the Aragon Government on tight schedules. Our old firewall dropped sessions often while the engineers were in the middle of submissions; the results were pure frustration and a loss of trust. With Cisco, we estimate 85% boost in trust, reliability, and productivity.
- The years we have used Cisco Secure Firewall have saved us thousands of dollars in costs we would have incurred in the event of a ransomware attack or other threat.

























