UserWay ensures that websites, apps, and digital documents more readily comply with accessibility regulations, such as WCAG 2.1 AA, WCAG 2.2, EN 301-549, EAA, ADA, and Section 508.
$49
per month
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
WAVE is a suite of evaluation tools that helps authors make their web content more accessible to individuals with disabilities. WAVE can identify many accessibility and Web Content Accessibility Guideline (WCAG) errors, but also facilitates human evaluation of web content. The vendor, WebAIM who offers WAVE as a free suite of tools, states their philosophy is to focus on issues that they know impact end users, facilitate human evaluation, and to educate about web…
$0
Pricing
UserWay Accessibility Widget
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
WAVE API Credits 10000+
$0.25
per credit
WAVE API Credits 1000-9999
$0.3
per credit
WAVE API Credits 250-999
$0.4
per credit
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
UserWay Accessibility Widget
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
UserWay Accessibility Widget
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Considered Both Products
UserWay Accessibility Widget
No answer on this topic
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Verified User
Employee
Chose WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
The other tools would be a little better than WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool. They do require you to pay for their services but offer more support on a daily basis so I would say it would be worth the money. However, I could not go ahead with the websites because they …
Accessibility on websites today is usually a convoluted process of testing and re-designing, but with Userway, the process is smooth. So for someone making their own simple marketing website for their small business, Userway could potentially save their company thousands of dollars and countless hours of development time and stress.
This is pretty middle of the road. It does a good job of picking out some of the low-hanging fruit, but it's not going properly evaluate semantic structure and will pop several false positives. Additionally, the tools are incomplete. For instance, the contrast editor will allow you to test your colors with sliders so you can get the closest color that passes; however, that isn't how color palettes work, you generally don't get to change a companies palette without a lot of pain; furthermore, there is no ability to adjust the font-size and both font-size AND color are used to determine contrast requirements. Oh, and they use points VS pixels...nobody is using points on the web even if the ADA uses them in their fairly dated guidelines. Text from the actual contrast editor "Text is present that has a contrast ratio less than 4.5:1, or large text (larger than 18 point or 14 point bold) has a contrast ratio less than 3:1.". 14pt = 18.66 pixels, so I can see their logic even if I don't agree with it
For this, I'm speaking specifically to the Siteimprove browser plugin. The Siteimprove plugin: Allows to filter on guideline level Catches a few more errors than WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool, but comes pretty close But, both do a great job in all other aspects WebAIM shines in its simplicity of overlaying of errors and warnings on the page. I think its real benefit is a lower learning curve on understanding how to use the tool