Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Polarion ALM is an application requirement management software platform now owned and supported by Siemens since the 2015 acquisition. It is available on the cloud (Polarion X) and on-premise. Polarion connect teams and projects to improve application development processes with a single, unified solution for requirements, coding, testing and release.N/A
Pricing
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Editions & Modules
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll editions include unlimited boards.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.1
24 Ratings
1% below category average
Polarion ALM
-
Ratings
Task Management9.824 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.821 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling9.719 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology4.114 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management6.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access2.214 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking6.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management6.79 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.8
7 Ratings
2% above category average
Polarion ALM
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations7.65 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Small Businesses
Craft
Craft
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(30 ratings)
9.9
(22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(5 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Planview AgilePlacePolarion ALM
Likelihood to Recommend
Planview
This tool enables the visual management needed in many offshore teams to easily and quickly see the pending work, work in progress and completed work.For teams that work with a waterfall methodology and do not have AGILE internalized, I believe there are other solutions from Planview or other providers.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Polarion ALM shines where it is intended to be used: Application Lifecycle Management. It fits well with agile development concepts, but the extensive customization abilities allow it to adapt to other concepts, too. It is suitable as an all-in-one solution, which is capable of giving transparency over all related areas, be it Requirement Management, Test Management, Release Management, Defect Management, etc., to the involved stakeholders.
Read full review
Pros
Planview
  • Visual kanban board that is easy to customize as the team's needs change
  • Real time collaboration allowing teams working remotely to stay up to date on current status
  • Allows versatility for how a team needs to capture details on the work at hand by utilizing card icons, card types and custom data points
  • Card scoring is easy to setup and provides the team the ability to set values to better prioritize their backlog
  • Ability to add card automation to take out some of the repetitive manual actions
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • Requirements Management:
  • Polarion ALM provides a centralized repository for capturing and managing requirements. Teams can define, organize, and link requirements to other artifacts like test cases and development tasks.
  • Test Management:
  • Polarion ALM facilitates end-to-end test management. Teams can create detailed test cases, manage test execution, and track test results.
  • Traceability and Impact Analysis:
  • Polarion ALM ensures traceability across all phases of the development lifecycle. Users can establish links between requirements, test cases, development tasks, and other artifacts. This traceability helps in impact analysis, allowing teams to understand how changes in one area may affect other parts of the project.
  • Customization and Adaptability:
  • Polarion ALM is highly customizable to fit the unique needs of different organizations and industries. Users can create custom workflows, define custom fields, and adapt the tool to their specific development processes.
Read full review
Cons
Planview
  • Ability to add more than 1 visual cue to the card. We use custom icons and sometimes more than 1 is appropriate but you have to choose which is most important since only 1 can be applied.
  • Better visibility to board access from the user administration screens. Currently have to run 1-2 reports to see this information. Would like to be able to click on a user within Configure Users and see what boards they have access to quickly.
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • More robust engine as far as the actual took is concerned. There are navigation components in trace to reporting which we feel can be improved especially when dealing with cross global accessing of the tool. It slows us down a bit so it's backend driven optimization as well as some front end "clunkiness" that can be improved.
  • Improve some filtering capabilities especially in creating custom reports and generally all around the ALM components of the tool.
  • As of the version we have, the ability to enhance replationship types in traceability is limited.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Planview
we are happy with the tool and the service and continuos improvement of the tool so there is no need yet to change to another one.
Read full review
Siemens AG
There is too much at stake to go into a new system. But with everything else being promised as far as newer more innovative products, the justification to not renew is a huge risk so that is not a concern
Read full review
Usability
Planview
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Planview
Not experienced any outage
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
Performance
Planview
Larger boards take longer to load
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Planview
Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Planview
Very easy.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Planview
Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Polarion ALM has the best usability, extensibility and reactiv product management. The support is also very good compared to other companies. Or in other words it is closer to the customer. Codebeamer is for sure also a good ALM tool with a great feature set, but existing customers are often neglected. We will see, what PTC as the new owner of codebeamer will change at this point.
Read full review
Scalability
Planview
Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Planview
  • LeanKit has made it easier for new employees to understand other employees' roles in the company by seeing their workload.
  • It makes it clear who is responsible for what project so that there is more accountability at our company.
  • It helps our project manager schedule new projects in a way that we all can see.
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • Many of our customers have achieved things that they could not have done without Polarion
  • Possibility to make engineering enjoyable and not so documentation oriented (especially in regulated industries)
  • Automatic and all the time up-to-date reporting gives savings in time
  • Information reuse is typically giving benefits in resource use and time-to-market. Up to 40% reduction in time-to-market seen.
  • 10-20% reduction in R&D cost is typically achievable
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.

Polarion ALM Screenshots

Screenshot of Combination and Appending of Multiple Live Docs 2Screenshot of Combination and Appending of Multiple Live DocsScreenshot of Document Baselines, Collections and ReuseScreenshot of Functional and user experience improvementsScreenshot of Performance and Sacalability OptimizationsScreenshot of Polarion Jenkins Connector