PingOne from Ping Identity vs. Sift Digital Trust & Safety Suite

The products we're using work well and are reliable. We've had very few outages, and when we have, their support team has been highly responsive and addressed the issues quickly. They are very customer focused and have been great partners throughout the relationship. I'm looking to adopt more of their technologies over the coming year.

We haven't really taken advantages of the full spectrum of what the suite offers, but for the segment that we are using that identifies users across multiple accounts and devices, it performs phenomenally. In the future we'd like to enable auto-banning based on a risk index score that Sift Digital Trust & Safety Suite would contribute to.

Incentivized

• It is very simple to onboard the application
• It provide lot of flexibility with SSO functions
• It helped reducing the cost.

Incentivized

• Identify users across multiple accounts
• Identify users across multiple devices

Incentivized

• There are times that the response time is quite slow.
• Since this is built on Google Cloud, there are moments when we encounter errors when logging in or looping in Google.
• UI could be improved.

Incentivized

• Some transparency into how Sift Digital Trust & Safety Suite identifies common user patterns that lend to its intelligence model

Incentivized

Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.

Ping's support is willing and attentive, but if I am in a position to engage them I am often at a point where most of the usual support engineers would not be in a position to answer the questions I have. However, Ping has been more than willing to engage their product and development teams with our organization as we take advanced deployment and use case challenges to them.

Incentivized

We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this product. We started exploration for PingDataSync (to synchronize two different LDAP directories), [and] so far it looks promising.

Sift Digital Trust & Safety Suite provided the easiest integration points plus reliability compared to other vendors we evaluated. We were able to incorporate their data into a custom UI of our own to manually audit and ban users.

Incentivized

• Flexibility is key, we can integrate with any solution.
• Single control plane for all authentication.
• A single provider for all authentication needs simplifies the stack and solution, and therefore the maintenance experience for users.

Incentivized

• It has had the positive impact of ensuring quality submissions as well as reducing payout for duplicate accounts.

Incentivized