Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. SecurityScorecard

Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.

Incentivized

Good:

* Initial recognition of perimeter

* Discovery of shadow IT assets

* Get nice reports to set baselines and objectives for your customers

Bad

* Does not provide threat intel as another tool

* Not enough documentation for the API or to automate scenarios

Incentivized

• Threat intelligence
• Emerging Threats
• Intelligence feeds

Incentivized

• Security Ratings
• Security Assessments
• Reporting Center

Incentivized

• third party product integration
• simplicity of the managment console
• integration to cortex agents directly

Incentivized

• Pricing could be reviewed for specific industries which were more impacted by the pandemic situation.

Incentivized

If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.

Incentivized

n/a

Incentivized

• Cheap for us
• Easy integration
• Easy management

Incentivized

• Get insights about our external security posture
• Actionable tasks to solve

Incentivized