Microsoft Sentinel vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Sentinel (formerly Azure Sentinel) is designed as a birds-eye view across the enterprise. It is presented as a security information and event management (SIEM) solution for proactive threat detection, investigation, and response.
$2.46
per GB ingested
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Cortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Editions & Modules
Azure Sentinel
$2.46
per GB ingested
100 GB per day
$123.00
per day
200 GB per day
$221.40
per day
300 GB per day
$319.80
per day
400 GB per day
$410.00
per day
500 GB per day
$492.00
per day
More than 500 GB per day
$492.00 + $98.40
per day/plus each additional 100 GB increment
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Sentinel
7.9
16 Ratings
3% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
-
Ratings
Centralized event and log data collection8.316 Ratings00 Ratings
Correlation7.816 Ratings00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management7.816 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility8.115 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools7.815 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces7.116 Ratings00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection7.613 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration/API management8.115 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds7.815 Ratings00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation8.115 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching7.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 7.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.7 out of 10
Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOAR
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.7 out of 10
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(24 ratings)
8.3
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SentinelPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Well, it's definitely suited to log in monitor most of the normal security infrastructure and collect security telemetry. It also extends well to Microsoft's entire suite with regards to data collection for things like Office 365, Power BI, power apps, and the like. It is also pretty good at collecting information from homegrown applications, especially if you're building in Azure.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
of a button.
●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Sentinel is by far the most efficient tool in supporting the highest number of solutions and products when it comes to data connection (or ingestion) and that too in the least complex manner possible. Most of the data connectors in Sentinel are very easy to configure and deploy.
  • Incident Management is undoubtedly one of the main USPs of Sentinel. With an easy-to-use UI, variety of utilities (adding tasks, manual triggering of playbooks, activity logs etc.) and provision of having an investigation map from the incident details page, Sentinel clearly stands out in this area.
  • I personally love the feature of integrating 'Threat Intelligence' to Sentinel from a free and one of the most reliable sources, Microsoft itself. This not only saves time for an analyst in checking the reputation of an entity but also allows to take actions on the suspicious entities at earliest.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Automation with immediate security responses.
  • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
  • Analysis and reporting feature.
  • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
  • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
  • Centralized monitoring.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It takes some time to learn how to use and install it properly, and it does not connect effectively with external PaaS systems such as Salesforce CRM, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, and so on.
  • Microsoft can simplify the display of the logs to make them easier to study, and the user interface occasionally delays, which can also be enhanced.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • The XSOAR bot creates a lot of noise on the summary page of any XSOAR incident. Although the filter is available to reduce the view, by default this should not be visible cluttering the whole scenario.
  • The interface has too much data on a single pane. I would love to have many buttons to just click and do stuff.
  • Also, I would love to have search areas more interactive and easier to navigate.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
The Microsoft Azure Sentinel solution is very good and even better if you use Azure. It's easy to implement and learn how to use the tool with an intuitive and simple interface. New updates are happening to always bring new news and improve the experience and usability. The solution brings reliability as it is from a very reliable manufacturer.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Azure Sentinel is very easy to use and configure. If you are stuck somewhere, Microsoft support is excellent in assisting and solving your issue.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
It was much easier than we all anticipated.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The key advantage of using Sentinel lies in Microsoft already being a renowned name in cloud services. Hence, the Collection of data at the cloud scale across all users, devices, applications, and infrastructure, both on-premises and especially in the MS Cloud, is super easy. Additionally, leveraging Threat Intel from Microsoft itself gives a sense of security, given their years of experience in the collection of intel. The AI and Machine learning features provided by MS is one of the finest.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
Did not use professional services
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Less overhead on integration of cloud-native logging
  • The KQL language is very helpful since it can be used for security and operational monitoring but as well for workbooks and dashboarding
  • A large community developing solutions is very helpful for a quick adoption
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Demisto has Eased malware analysis and threat hunting
  • With Demisto, it is simple to create playbooks and scripts
  • This is helped automate policy configurations on our PA firewalls through Panorama
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Sentinel Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Microsoft Sentinel Capabilities