Jupyter Notebook vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
SAS Enterprise Miner
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SAS Enterprise Miner is a data science and statistical modeling solution enabling the creation of predictive and descriptive models on very large data sources across the organization.N/A
Pricing
Jupyter NotebookSAS Enterprise Miner
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jupyter NotebookSAS Enterprise Miner
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Jupyter NotebookSAS Enterprise Miner
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
8.5
21 Ratings
1% above category average
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.8
4 Ratings
4% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.021 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources9.220 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection8.514 Ratings9.34 Ratings
MDM Integration7.415 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.6
21 Ratings
13% above category average
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.1
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Visualization9.621 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis9.621 Ratings9.14 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
21 Ratings
9% above category average
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.0
4 Ratings
3% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment9.320 Ratings7.84 Ratings
Data Transformations8.921 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Data Encryption8.514 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.314 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
8.9
21 Ratings
5% above category average
SAS Enterprise Miner
8.8
4 Ratings
3% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.020 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.218 Ratings9.82 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development9.321 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings9.23 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
8.8
19 Ratings
2% above category average
SAS Enterprise Miner
7.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.819 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls8.718 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jupyter NotebookSAS Enterprise Miner
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jupyter NotebookSAS Enterprise Miner
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(22 ratings)
9.9
(4 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jupyter NotebookSAS Enterprise Miner
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
Read full review
SAS
SAS Enterprise Miner is world-class software for individuals interested in developing reproducible models in a reasonable amount of time. Perhaps the most useful part of SAS Enterprise Miner is the ability to compare models with other models without writing code. The ensemble modeling capabilities is the easiest way to do ensemble modeling I have come across. SAS Enterprise Miner is well-suited for beginning to advanced analysts who know something about advanced analytics. The software is not well-suited for analysts or companies that have little interest in advanced modeling.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
  • The ability to see the output after each step.
  • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
  • Easy-user friendly interface.
Read full review
SAS
  • Enterprise Miner is really visual and lets you do a whole lot without actually going into the detailed options. For decent results, you should really explore the different advanced options though.
  • The recent versions of Miner allow users to use R code in Miner. You can then compare several models and approach to get the best performing model.
  • The resulting data is really well displayed and easy to understand (ex: the lift graph, score ranking, etc.)
  • Miner has the ability to integrate custom SAS code which allows the user to add functionalities that are specific to the project.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
SAS
  • SAS is not as user friendly as other stats software.
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
SAS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Open Source
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
SAS
SAS' customer support used to be non-existent many years ago. Today, contacting SAS customer support is great. They are responsible, knowledgable, and seem to have an interest in getting the results right the first time. With that said, Enterprise Miner's online support is weak, probably because the user base is much smaller than other tools.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Read full review
SAS
SAS EM has a very great set of machine learning and predictive analytics toolsets, which helped our organization achieve its goals. We used other tools, but for us, SAS EM was the most intuitive and easy to learn the tool and it provides greater data exploration and data preparation capabilities compared to the other tools we used.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
SAS
  • In our organization, users were using SAS already so the learning curve was really low. Within a few weeks after the implementation, the users were already delivering models developed with SAS Enterprise Miner. It is difficult to talk about ROI as models were already being developed before. It was mostly a change of technology and it was a smooth transition.
  • Going with Enterprise Miner came with migration from desktop use of SAS to a server use of SAS. This created a new role of SAS administrator. This was obviously a cost but as the use of SAS increased greatly, it was expected.
  • From a methodology standpoint, Enterprise Miner helped greatly in the documentation of the model development which was a requirement in a few groups such as the risk groups. Having a visual "GUI-like" approach to development, the flowchart or diagram of the project in Miner was able to give users a good understanding of the approach the analyst took to develop the model.
Read full review
ScreenShots