IBM CICS Transaction Server vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM CICS Transaction Server
ScoreĀ 9.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
IBM CICS (Customer Information Control System) is mixed-language application server that runs on IBM z/OS. CICSĀ® Transaction Server, often called CICS, is used for hosting transactional enterprise applications in a hybrid architecture.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
ScoreĀ 6.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Features
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM CICS Transaction Server
8.0
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
7.3
34 Ratings
9% below category average
IDE support5.01 Ratings6.631 Ratings
Security management9.02 Ratings5.632 Ratings
Administration and management9.02 Ratings8.234 Ratings
Application server performance10.02 Ratings7.233 Ratings
Installation8.02 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.02 Ratings7.223 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
NGINX
NGINX
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
NGINX
NGINX
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
NGINX
NGINX
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
6.5
(41 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM CICS Transaction ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM CICS Transaction Server is multi-decades proven transaction server which is very scalable, very secured, easy to use, has good transactional capabilities, works well all other mainframe resources such as Db2, languages on IBM mainframe, has access control capabilities in terms of who can access the transaction for read mode vs update mode, etc.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • De facto standard in the legacy enterprise
  • Multiplatform connection
  • Native connection with DB2
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Would like to see the transaction response matrix on the average transaction response among all requests.
  • Would like to see GUI tool to be able to see currently running transactions
  • Would like to be able to get the details of where the cics transaction was triggered from
Read full review
Oracle
  • The Admin UI should be further simplified, the UI design was not too user-friendlyā€” too many options and clicks required, difficult for the new beginners to figure out what they are looking for.
  • The admin server becomes the single failure point, although Oracle suggested some workarounds by setting VIP and VHost, it was not quite easy and straight forward.
  • Domain replication is hard, requiring a lot of knowledge and scripts efforts.
  • Admin will hang if the node manager communication encounters some issues for one or some nodes in the domain/cluster.
  • Not able to kill/terminate the stuck thread, the only way is to restart the managed server (JVM)
  • License cost is too high, for small businesses.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I would have given it a 10 but sometimes the hogging threads become a issue and needs server bounce. Except that, we are very pleased with the product.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
There is no comparison, in practice, the possibility of using the latest programming languages but, above all, the databases can be different and more modern than DL1.
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It has allowed us to use our decades old code and still continue to support the business
  • Allows us to have faster time to market and modernize our systems
  • We can still continue to use our legacy resources for modern systems
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots