GoProof brings all creative media collaboration into one central place so you don't have to use a ton of different systems and workflows just to get approval, with collaboration tools for document and video creative work, all managed in what is offered by the vendor as a user-friendly proof dashboard. The vendor states that GoProof features deeper
N/A
Ziflow
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Ziflow online proofing creates a single source of truth and streamlines the review and approval process for creative content to deliver marketing projects faster for agencies and brands.
$199
per month
Pricing
GoProof
Ziflow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$199
per year
Pro
$329
per year
Free
Free version
Per User / Per Month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoProof
Ziflow
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Single and multi-user licensing available. Chargeable licences are based on the number of creative proof senders required. All collaborators are free and unlimited. Number of proofs is also unlimited.
Pricing reflects a 20% discount for the annual subscription. Educational discounts are available for the Business and Enterprise editions.
Ziflow has been great at delivering our company with a superior proofing system. While I was on the fence between GoProof and Ziflow, I ultimately made the decision to use Ziflow for a few reasons.
They set up live demonstrations of how the system works and answered all my …
Workfront - Workfront asked for too much per user just to use their proofing tool. PageProof - User interface wasn't as good. GoProof - No side by side comparison, limited file type support.
Ziflow has more options and the ability to see side-by-side comparisons of proofs, and the use of the plug-in is enough to convince me to use Ziflow instead. It's more user-friendly and shares the progress of proofs, and is just a better software option. I would choose Ziflow …
We ultimately moved away from Adobe Acrobat shared PDFs because we needed more functionality that a true proofing platform would provide. After researching many different options, Ziflow was the solution that fit our needs without paying for a ton of extra functions we simply …
For our purposes, Ziflow had the right balance of customisation, security and ease-of-use. Some of the others appeared robust, but did not deliver the user-experience, with very slow load times for some files, or did not allow for saved workflows, which would mean content …
In our small membership-based organization, we have many stakeholders both internally and externally. GoProof doesn't require accounts and is extremely user friendly. I find even the most technology-hesitant person is comfortable using GoProof. Many within my company take advantage of a flexible schedule, but that means reviewing marketing projects under deadlines can be tricky. GoProof can be easily accessed and proofs quickly reviewed. The system then notifies all stakeholders of updates so fewer emails need to be sent. It's much more efficient and I find work is completed much faster.
We work with a lot of cross functional teams, so it is nice to have them review things on their own and provide feedback all in the one place for our team to review. It helps cut back on meetings and emails full of feedback that gets lost. This is especially helpful when we are working on our catalogs. We do reviews on Ziflow all the way from rough layouts to proofreading.
Simple and user friendly interface with little if no learning curve.
Accurate and specific change requests are especially enhanced when using the markup tools.
Nice to be able to assign who the decision maker is and also be able to change project participants easily, like when someone goes on holiday or sick leave.
SOCD (sent, opened, comment, decision) progress indicators provide an awesome 'at a glance' view of project participants activity.
Email notifications and integration with ASANA is brilliant.
Comments with instances that span multiple pages force you to zoom out, which can be rough on multi-page proofs. We end up making a comment on each instance for ease of review.
Maybe it is in there, but I would love to be able to upload a new version and review/make comments before any of the other reviewers can see it—to double-check for errors. Maybe there is a verification stage first before releasing it to the other reviewers.
Ziflow is easy to use, efficient and now is also part of our daily lives. Hence, the teams are already adapted to the tool and willing to work with it. The features are according to all what was expected and we had a great experience until the moment with the tool
The tool is easy to use for digital oriented people. For the ones not used to this kind of environment, it could look a bit complicated at the beginning, but following the instructions and tutorials and performing it once makes you get a grip of it in just one use.
The ZIflow support team has always been very responsive to my questions, issues and other problems. The good thing is I have never had to use their support team all that much because Ziflow has been for the most part trouble free. If it had been error prone, we would have dropped it long ago.
I prefer GoProof over PageProof. GoProof has a more user-friendly layout and workflow. PageProof has many functions hidden on the screen so it's not as simple to understand. One of the features, in particular, adding other reviewers, is too complicated with PageProof and I am never sure if I am doing it correctly. GoProof allows proofs to be removed by an administrator no matter the status of the creator. With PageProof, I have proofs sitting in my inbox for months that were unfinished for a reason but I can't remove them. PageProof does allow emails and webpage to be sent through the system to review function and design. It's a really great feature that I wish GoProof had.
I found Ziflow to be much better than PageProof in several ways. The tools available for making comments and edits are more intuitive and there is a greater variety of tools and the version control features worked much better as well. Also their customer service was far better when it was necessary to interact with the company