iStock, from Getty Images vs. TEHTRIS XDR Platform

The best examples I have of my experience with iStock, from Getty Images comes from times I am creating prototypes or design concepts to show off a new content type or provide visual examples of how a page could look with the addition of good photography. My only downside is sometimes it can be a struggle to find organic looking stock images which is a key part of the brand identity we have.

Incentivized

The primary reason for looking for this program was the accessibility that we had to find all the support functions. In later updates, I think that the UI UX was de-implemented making the search more difficult. I think it is necessary that the teams that use the product are well trained so that the UI UX is not a bother. 7.

Incentivized

• Variety
• Diversity
• Ease of use

Incentivized

• Specificity
• Lots of odd photos
• DEI

Incentivized

• CET business hours are the only time that the SOC is open to the public.
• A few difficulties in distributing data.
• Intuitive UX Dashboard.

Incentivized

Compared to these others I feel that iStock has better variety and selection, better ease of use/interface/search features, fresher selection, and better pricing options. I don't like that Adobe Stock only has subscription options (last I checked) and I do not use them for that reason. I don't like the interface of Shutterstock as much and it's harder to download a test image to try out.

Incentivized

• Provided good stock imagery for really niche content areas, sometimes organic photography can be hard to replicate what stock does well
• Helped to quickly gain access to advertisement ready music tracks when the marketing team have been stuck for audio
• Allowed designers to provide high fidelity examples of brand styling or campaign ideas

Incentivized

• Violations resolved in 100% which is incredible.
• Costs falling in the long run.
• I think it has increased the unity of the team due to the ease of understanding its tools.

Incentivized