Azure Logic Apps vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Logic Apps
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Cortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
Pricing
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Editions & Modules
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Logic Apps
8.8
13 Ratings
8% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors8.813 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification8.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration8.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.913 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features8.813 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console8.813 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zapier
Zapier
Score 8.9 out of 10
Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOAR
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Integration Suite
SAP Integration Suite
Score 8.7 out of 10
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(13 ratings)
8.3
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Logic AppsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps was a perfect solution for us to integrate the apps and products we used in our business to create automated workflows which were also complex and very advanced. This was a very new feature for us, and also it reduced our software costs massively and also saved us a lot of time. With the crisis, we were in back then Azure turned out to be the best cost-friendly solution because we only had to pay for what we used!
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
of a button.
●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Connecting to different services using OOB connectors
  • Support for HTTP connectors which enables user to leverage RestAPIs
  • Readability, i.e., it looks just like a Visio diagram. Even managers or HRs can have a look and get to know what's happening
  • It's a Programmer's Lego. It's fun connecting them at the same time getting the work done
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Automation with immediate security responses.
  • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
  • Analysis and reporting feature.
  • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
  • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
  • Centralized monitoring.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
  • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • The XSOAR bot creates a lot of noise on the summary page of any XSOAR incident. Although the filter is available to reduce the view, by default this should not be visible cluttering the whole scenario.
  • The interface has too much data on a single pane. I would love to have many buttons to just click and do stuff.
  • Also, I would love to have search areas more interactive and easier to navigate.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Azure Logic Apps on the surface are very intuitive. There is definitely room for improvement but it was very well laid out. The main thing with the UI is that its baked into Azure which at times can be a confusing platform to navigate. This is not the fault of Azure Logic Apps for the Azure platform.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
As with other Microsoft Azure support, Microsoft Logic Apps is hit or miss depending on the issue you are having. If it's simple then the resolution can be very quick. If it requires an engineer to review, then it will take them quite a while to look up a solution as they dig through.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
It was much easier than we all anticipated.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
This is very dependent on the line of work you are in and the unique company requirements, as is the case with everything. We utilize Azure Logic Apps for all of our computing solutions within our domain, and it has always worked flawlessly. One of the simplest clouds to set up and use is by far the most popular.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
  • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
  • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Demisto has Eased malware analysis and threat hunting
  • With Demisto, it is simple to create playbooks and scripts
  • This is helped automate policy configurations on our PA firewalls through Panorama
Read full review
ScreenShots