Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM) vs. Spotfire

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Available on Microsoft's Azure platform, Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVMs) are comprehensive pre-configured virtual machines for data science modelling, development and deployment.N/A
Spotfire
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Spotfire® is a data visualization platform that utilizes predictive analytics. In addition to data viz, it includes data wrangling capabilities, predictive analytics, location analytics, and real-time streaming analytics. Spotfire® is a business unit of Cloud Software Group, formerly known as TIBCO Spotfire.
$0.99
Per Hour (Starting)
Pricing
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Spotfire for Amazon Web Services
$0.99
Per Hour (Starting)
Spotfire Cloud - Consumer
$250/yr
per seat
Spotfire Cloud - Business Author
$650/yr
per seat
Spotfire Cloud - Analyst
$1250/yr
per seat
Spotfire Platform
Please contact Spotfire sales
Spotfire Cloud Enterprise
Please contact Spotfire sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFor Enterprise engagements, please contact TIBCO directly for a custom price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.7
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Spotfire
9.1
3 Ratings
7% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources7.82 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources9.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
MDM Integration9.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.1
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Spotfire
9.1
3 Ratings
7% above category average
Visualization7.82 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.42 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.9
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Spotfire
9.1
3 Ratings
10% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment9.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Data Transformations9.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Data Encryption9.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Built-in Processors8.42 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
8.4
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Spotfire
9.1
3 Ratings
7% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools8.42 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.02 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development7.82 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.42 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)
7.7
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Spotfire
9.1
3 Ratings
6% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.42 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(2 ratings)
8.6
(345 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(30 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(27 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(14 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(27 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(52 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(55 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(17 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Data Science Virtual Machines (DSVM)Spotfire
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure DSVM is useful in [a] Machine Learning environment where GPU-based processing is [required]. [The] most relevant [users] for the Azure DSVM is in ML/AI for model training and processing [high-end] CPU tasks with GPU compatibility. Azure DSVM is built for [a] startup to low medium IT environments where the ML/AI-based projects are [carried] out.
Read full review
Spotfire
A high level of data integration is available here it supports various data sources and so on. Collaborating features allow users to give access to the dashboard and merge data analytics with other team members. It can meet the demands of both small and large size business enterprises. A customized dashboard and reports are provided to meet the specific needs and get support of extensibility through APIs and customized scripts.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Leveraging data.
  • Computer vision.
  • Data science.
Read full review
Spotfire
  • It has the best coding integration (python, R) of any BI product
  • The ability to work with very large datasets (10 mil+) is better than competitors
  • Export options are more complete and have better functionality
  • The data canvas is the best tool to join and transform data vs. competitors
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Azure DSVM pricing must be reduced so that an AI-based start-up can use the Azure DSVM.
  • Azure must create an environment to use Azure DSVM offline as well.
  • Lack of frameworks
Read full review
Spotfire
  • The donut chart is I guess a powerful illustrations but I hope it should be done quite simple in Spotfire. But in Spotfire there are lots of steps involve just to build a simple donut chart.
  • Table calculation (like Row or Column Differences) should be made simple or there should be drag and drop function for Table Calculation. No need for scripting.
  • Information Link should be changed. If new columns are added to the table just refreshing the data should be able to capture the new column. No need extra step to add column
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
-Easy to distribute information throughout the enterprise using the webplayer. -Ad hoc analysis is possible throughout the enterprise using business author in the webplayer or the thick client. -Low level of support needed by IT team. Access interfaces with LDAP and numerous other authentication methods. -Possible to continually extend the platform with JavaScript, R scripts, HTML, and custom extensions. -Ability to standardize data logic through pre-built queries in the Information Designer. Everyone in the enterprise is using the same logic -Tagging and bookmarking data allows for quick sharing of insights. -Integration with numerous data sources... flat files, data bases, big data, images, etc. -Much improved mapping capability. Also includes the ability to apply data points over any image.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
Basic tasks like generating meaningful information from large sets of raw data are very easy. The next step of linking to multiple live data sources and linking those tables and performing on the fly analysis of the imported data is understandably more difficult.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
Even though, it's a rather stable and predictable tool that's also fast, it does have some bugs and inconsistencies that shut down the system. Depending on the details, it could happen as often as 2-3 times a week, especially during the development period.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
Generally, the Spotfire client runs with very good performance. There are factors that could affect performance, but normally has to do with loading large analysis files from the library if the database is located some distance away and your global network is not optimal. Once you have your data table(s) loaded in the client application, usually the application is quite good performance-wise.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
Support has been helpful with issues. Support seems to know their product and its capabilities. It would also seem that they have a good sense of the context of the problem; where we are going with this issue and what we want the end outcome to be.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
The instructor was very in depth and provided relevant training to business users on how to create visualizations. They showed us how to alter settings and filter views, and provided resources for future questions. However, the instructor failed to cover data sources, connecting to data, etc. While it was helpful to see how users can use the data to create reports, they failed to properly instruct us on how to get the dataset in to begin with. We are still trying to figure out connections to certain databases (we have multiple different types).
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
The online training is good, provides a good base of knowledge. The video demonstrations were well-done and easy to follow along. Provided exercises are good as well, but I think there could be more challenging exercises. The training has also gone up in price significantly in the last 3 years (in USD, which hurts us even more in Canada), and I'm not sure it is worth the money it now costs (it is worth how much it cost 3 years ago, but not double that.)
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
The original architecture I created for our implementation had only a particular set of internal business units in mind. Over the years, Spotfire gained in popularity in our company and was being utilized across many more business units. Soon, its usage went beyond what the original architectural implementation could provide. We've since learned about how the product is used by the different teams and are currently in the middle of rolling out a new architecture. I suggest:
  • Have clearly defined service level agreements with all the teams that will use Spotfire. Your business intelligence group might only need availability during normal working hours, but your production support group might need 24/7 availability. If these groups share one Spotfire server, maintenance of that server might be a problem.
  • Know the different types of data you will be working with. One group might be working with "public" data while another group might work with sensitive data. Design your Library accordingly and with the proper permissions.
  • Know the roles of the users of Spotfire. Will there only be a small set of report writers or does everyone have write access to the Library?
  • ALWAYS add a timestamp prompt to your reports. You don't want multiple users opening a report that will try and pull down millions of rows of data to their local workstations. Another option, of course, is to just hard code a time range in the backing database view (i.e. where activity_date >= sysdate - 90, etc.), but I'd rather educate/train the user base if possible.
  • This probably goes without saying, but if possible, point to a separate reporting database or a logical standby database. You don't want the company pounding on your primaries and take down your order system.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
It's within the Azure environment and it's easy to manage.
Read full review
Spotfire
Spotfire is significantly ahead of both products from an ETL and data ingestion capability. Spotfire also has substantially better visualizations than Power BI, and although the native visualizations aren't as flexible in Tableau, Spotfire enables users to create completely custom javascript visaualizations, which neither Tableau or Power BI has. Tableau and Power BI are likely only superior to Spotfire with respect to embedded analysis on a website.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Spotfire
In an enterprise architecture, if Spotfire Advanced Data services(Composite Studio),data marts can be managed optimally and scalability in a data perspective is great. As the web player/consumer is directly proportional to RAM, if the enterprise can handle RAM requirement accomodating fail over mechanisms appropraitely, it is definitely scalable,
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Azure DSVM is little costly with long term support for ML based environments.
  • Azure DSVM is very good for short tasking and costs us [a] little low than the on-prem server.
  • [Scaling] option is very convenient.
Read full review
Spotfire
  • It is costly, so not suitable for small scale implementations.
  • Dashboards are as good as the developer, so need experience to get most out of it
  • You need to be on Spotfire 11 at least to implement out of the box visualizations
  • Integration with Python and R is a game changer, it comes very handy to onboard data scientists without much hassle
  • performance is exceptionally well.
  • Secure
Read full review
ScreenShots

Spotfire Screenshots

Screenshot of Smart Visual AnalyticsScreenshot of Geospatial AnalyticsScreenshot of Intelligent Data WranglingScreenshot of Point-and-click Data ScienceScreenshot of Real-time Streaming Analytics