Azure Automation vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Automation
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azure Automation is a solution to automate frequent, time-consuming, and error-prone cloud management tasks, and ensures consistent management for Windows and Linux. Users can write runbooks graphically in PowerShell or Python to integrate Azure services and other public systems required for deploying, configuring, and managing end-to-end processes. It can also be used to orchestrate across on-premises environments using a hybrid runbook worker to deliver on-demand services. Automations from…N/A
Trellix Cloud Workload Security
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Cloud Workload Security (formerly from McAfee) to give users a real-time view of running workloads through detecting workloads and pods. This product can integrate with both public and private cloud infrastructures.N/A
Pricing
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Automation
7.2
1 Ratings
13% below category average
Trellix Cloud Workload Security
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.5 out of 10
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.3 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
We have found Azure Automation to be well-suited for tasks that must be performed on a scheduled basis. No matter how simple or tedious tasks are to perform manually, if they run on a scheduled basis, it makes sense to have them automated. If the tasks at hand are only performed once or infrequently, then it may be best to continue performing them manually.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Suitable scenario: The McAfee Cloud Workload Security console has helped me a lot in saving physical resources. We no longer have to have a server and spend resources to maintain the console, everything is in the cloud. Unsuitable scenario: After the change to the cloud the McAfee Cloud Workload Security reduced many things that were made very easy when it was on a physical server. Active directory server integration with the console is a bit tricky. That should be improved and be somewhat more friendly when connecting to be able to migrate user machines.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Scheduled automation of Microsoft 365 and Azure tasks
  • Scheduled automation of scripting (e.g. Powershell)
  • Perform periodic maintenance
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Monitoring of detected threats
  • Checking the status of antivirus agents
  • Monitoring of antivirus software installed
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • An automation template library would be nice
  • Clear estimation of costs - this goes for the entire Azure Automation platform
  • It can be daunting at first due to all the settings and menu levels, but it is not difficult once you get started.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Improve integration with windows server active directory.
  • The monitoring of the implementation of missing components of the antivirus should be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We did not evaluate any other automation products since we are already using Microsoft 365 and the Azure platform. Additionally, Azure Automation allows for a reasonable number of tasks to be performed each month at no cost, which is especially nice when testing the platform. We found Azure Automate's integration of Powershell invaluable when working directly with Microsoft 365, Sharepoint, Azure AD, and other systems via API.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
We use McAfee Endpoint Security on user PCs and I must say that it is an excellent antivirus. The alerts we have had have been resolved without any problem. I totally recommend it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Ensures tasks are not forgotten
  • Saves times - routine tasks no longer have to be performed manually
  • Complicated tasks are no longer an issue
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Improved resource savings in terms of physical infrastructure.
Read full review
ScreenShots