Automox vs. Orca Cloud Security Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Automox
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Automox is an endpoint management platform built for the era of autonomous operations. It provides a cloud-native foundation that unifies automation, speed, visibility, and trust.N/A
Orca Cloud Security Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Orca's Cloud Security Platform is an agentless cloud-native security and compliance platform that allows users to gain complete visibility and coverage into their existing AWS, Azure, and GCP setups. Orca's platform features four main components which are: SideScanning Technology, Context-Aware Security, Built-in Compliance, Automation & Customization.N/A
Pricing
AutomoxOrca Cloud Security Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomoxOrca Cloud Security Platform
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomoxOrca Cloud Security Platform
Considered Both Products
Automox
Chose Automox
Automox is definitely better than Intune as it is way more compatible with other operating systems, as well as allowing patching for third party apps. Intune does have other features but thats because it is basically something else entirely. Automox has 1 goal and it achieves …
Chose Automox
Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool compared to the others we evaluated. The POC and deployment process were smooth, and pricing was competitive.
Chose Automox
I have used Tenable Patch Management, but the reason I did not go with it is because it uses on prem servers that we have to host instead of using Agent and cloud platform like Automox.

I feel like that is dated as most solutions are now changing into the cloud solutions.
Chose Automox
Specifically for patch management, Automox is one of the most user friendly options available. The ability to customize packages and target specific machines makes it a very useful tool. It's definitely a stand out software out of the options available.
Chose Automox
worklegs are more advance on Automox, and the reports on Automox give you more detail information, the patching support is better on Automox, Atera can be simple but effective. However, Automox is a more efficient tool and like said before, better for large counts of devices. …
Chose Automox
We felt that Automox provided us with the functionality our MSP offered, including OS and device patching, as well as remote control capabilities, but in a better and more manageable way. We also felt the usability of the tool gave us the ability to be effective in our way of …
Chose Automox
TeamViewer excels in remote support, but lacks in patch management. Automox's patch management is reliable and stable.
Chose Automox
Automox has a much better user interface. Much simpler to use and share tasks with other team members. They offer great additional training and certifications to help you become an expert.
Chose Automox
We chose Automox for it's clean/easy to use UI, remote control capabilities, and automation/patching. The balance of effectiveness and cost made it the best choice for our org
Chose Automox
While not a direct analog, we have noted that our A/V provider also handles patching. That being said, the solution is not as al la carte as Automox, and requires much more thought to implement. Automox is a favorite for its lightweight nature and it's time to implementation …
Chose Automox
All of these other products are overly complicated with user interfaces that are not very friendly.. too technical, even for IT pros. They are also expensive for smaller companies or those with limited IT budgets. I've found that these other solutions are really geared for …
Chose Automox
Automox has a could based console and platform which can cater the computers outside the network. It's not possible in Lan Guard. Also Automox support cross platform and have a very big 3rd party application support than intune. So better to go with Automox
Chose Automox
We just really liked the ease of use and setup for Automox over other products in general. Support is amazing as well.
Chose Automox
Cloud-based solution with no need for on-prem infrastructure. Support Windows, macOS, Linux, and third-party applications. Cost-effective solution compared with other vendors.
Chose Automox
Compared to these solutions, Automox outranks them as the Automox is highly personalized for different types of device types. It supports Windows, Linux, and macOS devices very effectively. Other products are also support other types of devices, but not this much of control can …
Chose Automox
Automox is by far the easiest to use and does a better job patching. The built in AI tool is a real time saver making writing Powershell scripts quick and easy.
Chose Automox
AutoMox is the first product I have tried for app updates, and I don't think I need to try any others.
Chose Automox
Don't remember the specific products as this was done by the whole team. But once we started evaluating Automox, it was definitely the product.
Chose Automox
Automox is cloud-based which makes it a much better product in todays world.
Orca Cloud Security Platform
Chose Orca Cloud Security Platform
Wiz and aqua are pretty good but Orca has better UI.
Best Alternatives
AutomoxOrca Cloud Security Platform
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomoxOrca Cloud Security Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomoxOrca Cloud Security Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Automox is suitable for environments like ours, where there are many endpoints and a large mix of third-party applications to keep updated, so the automation in a single console for system updates has made a noticeable difference. Additionally, the configuration changes have been great, such as removing outdated runtimes and updating our registry... It maintains a more consistent environment, allowing us to combat CVEs without strain.
Read full review
It's good for finding issues in SSH, ec2 instances, and so on. But it's not good at finding stuff for Serverless lambdas, for containers and some more.
Read full review
Pros
  • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
  • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
  • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
  • All the great information provided within one single device
Read full review
  • Scanning
  • CSPM
  • IAM Roles
Read full review
Cons
  • There exists an issue where you register some Amazon AMIs, which in even samples of 4 or 5, sometimes contain a duplicate identifier. Automox has provided a fix document, but it requires manual intervention and digging to discover this. I think they should identify a better way to assign UUIDs to machines, as sometimes registering too many VMs makes others "fall off"
  • Allow for multiple global admins
Read full review
  • Kubernetes
  • Docker containers
  • Serverless
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
This is a software that just works. Once configured its a set and forget kind of tool that keeps things up to date and alerts me if something is wrong. I was able to work through an expansion project to deploy an additional 500 devices in almost no time and create a robust self-patching environment.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's great at what it does. We're able to veiw endpoints that are online in real time, and run scans on them to ensure they're still compliant. The software itself is very easy to use and set up on end points, with the main admin portal having a clean and very easy to understand set up
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I did not need to reach out to support often but when I did the answers were relatively correct and they were answered quickly. The only thing I might "ding" their support on was their lack of understanding of OS's different from Windows and especially Linux. Other than that I was satisfied
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have used Tenable Patch Management, but the reason I did not go with it is because it uses on prem servers that we have to host instead of using Agent and cloud platform like Automox. I feel like that is dated as most solutions are now changing into the cloud solutions. Tenable system is also very hard to navigate and complex policy which makes it hard to get anything done.
Read full review
Wiz and aqua are pretty good but Orca has better UI.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We wanted to like the remote support software, but the experience was poor compared to a solution like BeyondTrust.
  • Development and deployment of worklets is fast for experienced coders.
  • Policy execution and reporting is fast and reliable.
  • The new analytics dashboard excels at reporting Mean Time to Remediation for executive reporting purposes.
Read full review
  • less need of security team
  • easy to use
  • it's not costly
Read full review
ScreenShots