Likelihood to Recommend Apache Flex is an open-source SDK used to make rich Internet applications. It's developed with Action Script and MXML and works particularly well with Android and iOS ecosystems. Any flash-based application framework, such as Eclipse or the Flash above Builder, can be used to implement this. Free is best for mobile app developers, but suppose you have concerns, and consider Apache Flex's development team welcomes any questions via email.
Read full review It's easy to create virtual environments and install packages for different projects as we may need project-specific packages for doing our experiments, also it's easy to see what changes we have made and create pull requests faster. But sometimes we want some light python editor like Jupiter notebook as PyCharm is relatively heavier, also Jupiter notebooks are a good option when we need to run remote code on local machines.
Read full review Pros Runs on flash (at the time this was handy, not so much now. hah). Good support from the company. Ability to run offline. Read full review Git integration is really essential as it allows anyone to visually see the local and remote changes, compare revisions without the need for complex commands. Complex debugging tools are basked into the IDE. Controls like break on exception are sometimes very helpful to identify errors quickly. Multiple runtimes - Python, Flask, Django, Docker are native the to IDE. This makes development and debugging and even more seamless. Integrates with Jupyter and Markdown files as well. Side by side rendering and editing makes it simple to develop such files. Read full review Cons It's heavy as it needs to load the Flash plugin first before rendering anything to the user. Not future ready as there is no support for mobile and tablet platforms. Read full review The biggest complaint I have about PyCharm is that it can use a lot of RAM which slows down the computer / IDE. I use the paid version, and have otherwise found nothing to complain about the interface, utility, and capabilities. Read full review Likelihood to Renew It's perfect for our needs, cuts development time, is really helpful for newbies to understand projects structure
Read full review Usability Pros: its customizable interface and IDE perfect for python projects. Some plugins are really useful. Cons: I dont recommend itfor small scripts because it is not a lightweight tool. The initial setup require some effort.
Read full review Support Rating I rate 10/10 because I have never needed a direct customer support from the JetBrains so far. Whenever and for whatever kind of problems I came across, I have been able to resolve it within the internet community, simply by Googling because turns out most of the time, it was me who lacked the proper information to use the IDE or simply make the proper configuration. I have never came across a bug in PyCharm either so it deserves 10/10 for overall support
Read full review Alternatives Considered Apache Flex is a modern, standards-based programming language that supports common design patterns. It's an open-source SDK used to make rich Internet applications that work on different browsers and platforms. Any flash-based application framework, such as Eclipse or the Flash above Builder, can be used to implement this. So far, in comparison, it's much more crucial, especially for people working in fields like mobile development.
Read full review PyCharm is the best IDE for python development. PyCharm offers various features: source code completion, support for unit testing, integration with Docker/GitLab/Git, ability to manage and configure virtual environments, auto-indentation, and re-factoring code with ease. Support for JSON/Shell scripts and support for Flask/Django Other tools are effective for creating isolated scripts but not for handling projects with more than two scripts.
Read full review Return on Investment Positive: Easy to learn if you already knew AS. Negative: Too heavy on flash knowledge (I know it's contradictory, but it was a plus & a minus). ROI was great since it saves time on multiple devices compiling. Read full review Buying the licensed pro version is a bit costly, but overall because of its features and its speed, the time taken by a developer to develop something can be improved. Indirectly getting a good return of Investment. Considering the team size and its features, one can go for the licensed version as the ROI is high. Customer support is also good for a licensed version, thereby saving the time, which in turn shows ROI as high. Read full review ScreenShots