Apache Airflow vs. Make

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Apache Airflow is an open source tool that can be used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor data pipelines using Python and SQL. Created at Airbnb as an open-source project in 2014, Airflow was brought into the Apache Software Foundation’s Incubator Program 2016 and announced as Top-Level Apache Project in 2019. It is used as a data orchestration solution, with over 140 integrations and community support.N/A
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Make (formerly Integromat) automates integration between applications. It features data transformation capabilities within a no-code graphic interface. The former Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020, and the current product Make is a Celonis brand.
$9
per month
Pricing
Apache AirflowMake
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per month
Core
$9
per month
Pro
$16
per month
Teams
$29
per month
Enterprise
Contact
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AirflowMake
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AirflowMake
Features
Apache AirflowMake
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
8.7
12 Ratings
3% above category average
Make
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.612 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.312 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
-
Ratings
Make
8.1
6 Ratings
1% above category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings8.96 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings7.76 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings6.26 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache AirflowMake
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Zapier
Zapier
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AirflowMake
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(12 ratings)
9.4
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(3 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AirflowMake
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Airflow is well-suited for data engineering pipelines, creating scheduled workflows, and working with various data sources. You can implement almost any kind of DAG for any use case using the different operators or enforce your operator using the Python operator with ease. The MLOps feature of Airflow can be enhanced to match MLFlow-like features, making Airflow the go-to solution for all workloads, from data science to data engineering.
Read full review
Celonis
Integromat is the best tool for business automation in my opinion because unlike Zapier it allows us to integrate with any API even if the app is not available which allows us to create automation even with the less known apps that we use or the ones that we built internally for our own company.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Apache Airflow is one of the best Orchestration platforms and a go-to scheduler for teams building a data platform or pipelines.
  • Apache Airflow supports multiple operators, such as the Databricks, Spark, and Python operators. All of these provide us with functionality to implement any business logic.
  • Apache Airflow is highly scalable, and we can run a large number of DAGs with ease. It provided HA and replication for workers. Maintaining airflow deployments is very easy, even for smaller teams, and we also get lots of metrics for observability.
Read full review
Celonis
  • UI/UX Simplicity and Features
  • Workflows are explained in details and even people without IT background can use the tool.
  • Consumption is nicely tracked.
  • Myriad of existing templates, solutions, and readymade connectors.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • UI/Dashboard can be updated to be customisable, and jobs summary in groups of errors/failures/success, instead of each job, so that a summary of errors can be used as a starting point for reviewing them.
  • Navigation - It's a bit dated. Could do with more modern web navigation UX. i.e. sidebars navigation instead of browser back/forward.
  • Again core functional reorg in terms of UX. Navigation can be improved for core functions as well, instead of discovery.
Read full review
Celonis
  • There are always new platforms and connections that we'd like to see
  • More flexibility in paying for operations (tasks) on a sliding scale, instead of by tier
  • More thorough support documentation on connecting various platforms and troubleshooting errors
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Celonis
At this point, it is firmly embedded in the DNA of the business and to give up the ability to automate workflows and create integrations on the fly would be a terrible idea.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
For its capability to connect with multicloud environments. Access Control management is something that we don't get in all the schedulers and orchestrators. But although it provides so many flexibility and options to due to python , some level of knowledge of python is needed to be able to build workflows.
Read full review
Celonis
Make's easy to understand user interface helps you to visualize what's happening at all times. Could use some tweaks around the navigation from a scenario specifically in the folders and back navigations. I can't tell you the amount of time wasted in that area. When you branch, you can't bring a branch back together in the same scenario which is kind of a bummer as well.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Celonis
The pricing schema is very attractive, almost 50% lower than the competition. You could start from free and then grow. It has a pretty big library of connections to other apps and services, which really helps you when everything is a mess. Integromat has a really easy-to-use interface. You could do almost everything with fewer than 5 clicks. Scenarios (automation steps to complete a routine) have graphics so you can configure them more easily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Multiple DAGs can be orchestrated simultaneously at varying times, and runs can be reproduced or replicated with relative ease. Overall, utilizing Apache Airflow is easier to use than other solutions now on the market. It is simple to integrate in Apache Airflow, and the workflow can be monitored and scheduling can be done quickly using Apache Airflow. We advocate using this tool for automating the data pipeline or process.
Read full review
Celonis
Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Impact Depends on number of workflows. If there are lot of workflows then it has a better usecase as the implementation is justified as it needs resources , dedicated VMs, Database that has a cost
  • Donot use it if you have very less usecases
Read full review
Celonis
  • We used too many credits multiple times and had to buy them additionally, there are no prevention systems to setup to alert before it happens.
  • Some consumption is difficult to understand and requires time and digging.
  • It requires heavy internal effort to simplify things in Make in order for it to operate cheaper.
  • Initial IT setup is paramount and determines a lot.
Read full review
ScreenShots