Likelihood to Recommend We are running it to perform preparation which takes a few hours on EC2 to be running on a spark-based EMR cluster to total the preparation inside minutes rather than a few hours. Ease of utilization and capacity to select from either Hadoop or spark. Processing time diminishes from 5-8 hours to 25-30 minutes compared with the Ec2 occurrence and more in a few cases.
Read full review OpenSearch Service presents a cost-effective pricing model, allowing users to pay solely for their usage without being burdened by minimum fees or upfront commitments. Its seamless integration with various AWS services enhances its adaptability for a wide range of data analysis requirements and also I love using it isn't it enough.
Read full review Pros EMR does well in managing the cost as it uses the task node cores to process the data and these instances are cheaper when the data is stored on s3. It is really cost efficient. No need to maintain any libraries to connect to AWS resources. EMR is highly available, secure and easy to launch. No much hassle in launching the cluster (Simple and easy). EMR manages the big data frameworks which the developer need not worry (no need to maintain the memory and framework settings) about the framework settings. It's all setup on launch time. The bootstrapping feature is great. Read full review Gives us millisecond response times Mainly open-source Integration Seamlessly with AWS Has a very big community so problems are fixes sooner then later Read full review Cons It would have been better if packages like HBase and Flume were available with Amazon EMR. This would make the product even more helpful in some cases. Products like Cloudera provide the options to move the whole deployment into a dedicated server and use it at our discretion. This would have been a good option if available with EMR. If EMR gave the option to be used with any choice of cloud provider, it would have helped instead of having to move the data from another cloud service to S3. Read full review Needs more descriptive documentation The UI feels a bit old Some functionality still doesn't work correctly Read full review Usability I give Amazon EMR this rating because while it is great at simplifying running big data frameworks, providing the Amazon EMR highlights, product details, and pricing information, and analyzing vast amounts of data, it can be run slow, freeze and glitch sometimes. So overall Amazon EMR is pretty good to use other than some basic issues.
Read full review Support Rating There's a vast group of trained and certified (by AWS) professionals ready to work for anyone that needs to implement, configure or fix EMR. There's also a great amount of documentation that is accessible to anyone who's trying to learn this. And there's also always the help of AWS itself. They have people ready to help you analyze your needs and then make a recommendation.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Snowflake is a lot easier to get started with than the other options.
Snowflake 's data lake building capabilities are far more powerful. Although Amazon EMR isn't our first pick, we've had an excellent experience with EC2 and S3. Because of our current API interfaces, it made more sense for us to continue with Hadoop rather than explore other options.
Read full review Well as I said, Elastic is behind paywall now and managing OpenSearch through AWS is so seamless that we just love it. It gets updates faster we don't have to manage separate infra and many other settings to work with elastic search and some of the tools that it provides are better then them.
Read full review Return on Investment It was obviously cheaper and convenient to use as most of our data processing and pipelines are on AWS. It was fast and readily available with a click and that saved a ton of time rather than having to figure out the down time of the cluster if its on premises. It saved time on processing chunks of big data which had to be processed in short period with minimal costs. EMR solved this as the cluster setup time and processing was simple, easy, cheap and fast. It had a negative impact as it was very difficult in submitting the test jobs as it lags a UI to submit spark code snippets. Read full review Well we had 200 ms response times which decreased to 100ms while using OpenSearch Easy to use security plugins we dont need external IAM Super Easy Integration with many AWS Services such as kinsesi data stream and dynamoDB Read full review ScreenShots